[FIX] Correct scope for new functions in the optimization context (CF-687)

[mohammedahmed18]

PR Type

Bug fix, Tests

---

Description

• Remove unused optimized helper functions

• Add function usage and import tracking

• Prevent duplicate helper file writes

• Test new helper functions scope

---

Changes diagram

flowchart LR
  O["Optimized code inserted"] --> R["replace_functions_in_file"]
  R --> U["Collect function usage"]
  R --> I["Track imports"]
  U & I --> F["Determine unused functions"]
  F --> D["Remove unused functions"]
  D --> C["Cleaned module code"]

Loading

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Formatting	1 files constants.py Remove stray commented metadata                                                    +0/-6
Enhancement	5 files base.py Add element serialization/deserialization functions            +115/-0  coordinates.py Implement coordinate conversion system                                      +113/-0  elements.py Add element classes and metadata handling                                +989/-0  optimized.py Provide optimized element deserialization code                      +165/-0  utils.py Define geometry type aliases                                                          +8/-0
Bug fix	2 files code_replacer.py Remove unused new helper functions                                              +94/-2    function_optimizer.py Prevent duplicate helper writes                                                    +2/-1
Tests	1 files test_code_replacement.py Add test for helper scope correctness                                        +63/-0
Configuration changes	1 files pyproject.toml Add codeflash tool configuration                                                  +7/-0

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about PR-Agent usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[github-actions]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Undefined variable module is not defined when tracking imports; the visitor should be applied to the parsed CST (e.g., modified_tree or original_module) instead of module. module.visit(import_tracker) Missing imports References to CoordinatesMetadata, DataSourceMetadata, and _kvform_rehydrate_internal_elements in ElementMetadata.from_dict are not imported, leading to potential NameError. coordinates = CoordinatesMetadata.from_dict(coords_val) if coords_val is not None else None data_source_val = key_value("data_source") data_source = DataSourceMetadata.from_dict(data_source_val) if data_source_val is not None else None orig_elements_val = key_value("orig_elements") orig_elements = ( elements_from_base64_gzipped_json(orig_elements_val) if orig_elements_val is not None else None ) key_value_pairs_val = key_value("key_value_pairs") key_value_pairs = ( _kvform_rehydrate_internal_elements(key_value_pairs_val) if key_value_pairs_val is not None else None

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Fix undefined AST traversal call The variable module is not defined in this scope and should use the parsed or modified CST. Replace the call to use modified_tree (or original_module) instead. This will correctly traverse the AST for import tracking. codeflash/code_utils/code_replacer.py [453-454] import_tracker = ImportTracker() -module.visit(import_tracker) +modified_tree.visit(import_tracker) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: The call to module.visit uses an undefined module variable and should be modified_tree.visit to correctly track imports.	High
	Simplify unused-check logic The removal condition is too broad and removes functions that are used and importable. Only functions that are neither used nor importable should be removed. Simplify the condition accordingly. codeflash/code_utils/code_replacer.py [474-476] -if used_and_can_be_imported or not_used_and_no_import_for_it: - # we then going to remove it +if fn_name not in used_functions and not can_be_imported: unused_new_function_names.append(fn_name) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The original condition also removes functions that are used but importable, whereas only functions neither used nor importable should be pruned.	Medium

[mohammedahmed18]

closing in favor of #553