⚡️ Speed up function find_codeflash_output_assignments by 21%
#491
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 21% (0.21x) speedup for
find_codeflash_output_assignmentsincodeflash/code_utils/edit_generated_tests.py⏱️ Runtime :
41.9 milliseconds→34.7 milliseconds(best of145runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here’s an optimized version of your code for speed, given the profiler shows almost all the time is inside
ast.parse()and especially invisitor.visit(tree). TheCfoVisitorimplementation is not shown, but the code will optimize how it's used.Changes/Optimizations.
CfoVisitorneeds only line mappings, we avoid passing the entiresource_codestring if possible—if you do not controlCfoVisitor, ignore this.CfoVisitoris a standardast.NodeVisitor, usingast.walk()or writing an iterative visitor (instead of recursive) is sometimes faster. But if its internal logic is complex, you’d likely get the best speed by using a C-optimized AST walker, but Python's ast isn’t pluggable that way.ast.parse(..., type_comments=True)is not default; so we can’t skip more work there.ast.parsewith a support for possibly pre-compiled ASTs (not possible here since you always receive newsource_code).With the given constraints, the code is likely already close to optimal for pure Python. The only micro-optimization realistically available in this snippet is to.
source_codestring from being retained in the visitor if not required (saving memory, especially for huge inputs).Most critically: If you control
CfoVisitor, re-implementing its logic in Cython or with a C extension would vastly speed up the slowest portion (visit).Assuming default use (no changes to CfoVisitor), here’s a slightly optimized code, including a minor AST traversal microspeedup.
If you control the implementation of
CfoVisitor, remove storingsource_codeas an attribute if not needed, which can yield memory and minor speed improvements.Further Optimization: Custom AST Walker
If CfoVisitor is simple, you may get a significant speed boost by rolling your own iterative AST traversal using
ast.walk(tree), avoiding double-dispatch ofvisit_*methods (especially if only one node type is relevant).Summary:
CfoVisitor.ast.walk()and filter node types directly—reducing Python call overhead.If you share the implementation of
CfoVisitor, I can reimplement the whole logic to be even faster! But with your constraints, these are all possible micro-optimizations.Let me know if you want a version that bakes in
CfoVisitorlogic or if you can share that code.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-find_codeflash_output_assignments-mcmnwrekand push.