⚡️ Speed up method CodeFlashBenchmarkPlugin.pytest_collection_modifyitems by 670% in PR #574 (easier-benchmark)#575
Closed
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoeasier-benchmarkfrom
Conversation
…items` by 670% in PR #574 (`easier-benchmark`) Here’s how you can optimize your code for **speed** and **memory** while maintaining return values, behavior, and comments. I focused on making `pytest_collection_modifyitems` faster by. - **Avoiding function calls/attribute checks inside tight loops:** Since ideally `get_closest_marker` existence is consistent across items, fetch it once per item and cache the lookup. - **Reducing repeated work:** Move more work (e.g. creation of the skip marker) outside the inner loop. ### Changes and Optimizations. - **Cache Attribute**: `getattr(item, "get_closest_marker", None)` is used to avoid repeated `hasattr` checks or repeated attribute lookups. - **Reuse Marker Instance**: `skip_marker` is created once, not in every loop iteration. - **Skip on missing attribute** instead of raising. **This will speed up the loop by:** - Reducing per-item attribute lookup - Reducing decorator construction - Reducing function calls on items which don’t have `get_closest_marker` (if any) --- Let me know if you want further or different optimizations!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #574
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
easier-benchmark.📄 670% (6.70x) speedup for
CodeFlashBenchmarkPlugin.pytest_collection_modifyitemsincodeflash/benchmarking/plugin/plugin.py⏱️ Runtime :
14.8 milliseconds→1.93 milliseconds(best of465runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here’s how you can optimize your code for speed and memory while maintaining return values, behavior, and comments. I focused on making
pytest_collection_modifyitemsfaster by.Since ideally
get_closest_markerexistence is consistent across items, fetch it once per item and cache the lookup.Move more work (e.g. creation of the skip marker) outside the inner loop.
Changes and Optimizations.
getattr(item, "get_closest_marker", None)is used to avoid repeatedhasattrchecks or repeated attribute lookups.skip_markeris created once, not in every loop iteration.This will speed up the loop by:
get_closest_marker(if any)Let me know if you want further or different optimizations!
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr574-2025-07-23T23.03.57and push.