⚡️ Speed up function mysorter by 36%

[codeflash-ai]

📄 36% (0.36x) speedup for mysorter in codeflash/bubble_sort.py

⏱️ Runtime : 3.96 microseconds → 2.92 microseconds (best of 26628 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization replaces the manual bubble sort implementation with Python's built-in arr.sort() method, resulting in a 35% speedup.

Key Changes:

• Eliminated the nested for loops that implemented bubble sort (O(n²) complexity)
• Replaced with arr.sort() which uses Timsort algorithm (O(n log n) complexity)
• Removed manual element swapping logic

Why This Is Faster:

1. Algorithm efficiency: Bubble sort requires O(n²) comparisons and swaps, while Timsort is O(n log n) on average
2. Native implementation: Python's sort() is implemented in optimized C code, avoiding Python interpreter overhead for the sorting logic
3. Reduced function calls: The line profiler shows the original code made 130+ hits across sorting lines, while the optimized version makes only 2 hits to arr.sort()

Performance Impact:

• Original: 50 microseconds total time with heavy computation in nested loops
• Optimized: 33 microseconds total time with minimal sorting overhead
• The sorting operation itself dropped from ~16 microseconds (multiple loop iterations) to just 2 microseconds

This optimization is particularly effective for larger arrays where the O(n²) vs O(n log n) difference becomes more pronounced, though even small arrays benefit from the native C implementation speed.

✅ Correctness verification report:

Test	Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests	🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests	🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests	✅ 1 Passed
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests	🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage	100.0%

⏪ Replay Tests and Runtime

Test File::Test Function	Original ⏱️	Optimized ⏱️	Speedup
test_UserscodeflashDownloadscodeflashdevcodeflashcodeflashbubble_sort_py__replay_test_0.py::test_codeflash_bubble_sort_mysorter	3.96μs	2.92μs	✅35.7%

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-mysorter-me37k012 and push.