⚡️ Speed up method AsyncCallInstrumenter._instrument_statement by 12% in PR #769 (clean-async-branch)
#775
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #769
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
clean-async-branch.📄 12% (0.12x) speedup for
AsyncCallInstrumenter._instrument_statementincodeflash/code_utils/instrument_existing_tests.py⏱️ Runtime :
17.5 milliseconds→15.7 milliseconds(best of39runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves an 11% speedup by replacing the expensive
ast.walk()with a custom stack-based traversal that supports early termination.Key optimizations:
Stack-based AST traversal with early exit: Instead of
ast.walk()which must visit every node, the optimized version uses a manual stack that immediately returnsTruewhen finding a matchingAwaitnode, avoiding unnecessary traversal of remaining subtrees.Function name caching: Pre-stores
self._function_name = function.function_namein__init__to eliminate repeated attribute lookups in_is_target_call().Local variable optimization: Extracts
func = call_node.functo reduce repeated attribute access.Performance impact by test type:
The optimization is most effective when matches are found early in the AST traversal, as it can skip examining the remaining nodes entirely. Line profiling shows the stack-based approach reduces the expensive
ast.walk()overhead from 29% to 21.5% of total time in_instrument_statement.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr769-2025-09-27T00.38.40and push.