Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link
Contributor

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Sep 27, 2025

⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #769

If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch clean-async-branch.

This PR will be automatically closed if the original PR is merged.


📄 23% (0.23x) speedup for remove_functions_from_generated_tests in codeflash/code_utils/edit_generated_tests.py

⏱️ Runtime : 1.46 milliseconds 1.19 milliseconds (best of 11 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization achieves a 22% speedup by eliminating redundant regex compilation and reducing unnecessary string operations.

Key optimizations:

  1. Pre-compiled regex patterns: The original code compiled the same regex pattern multiple times (3,114 compilations taking 43.4% of total time). The optimized version compiles each pattern only once upfront using _compile_function_patterns(), moving this expensive operation outside the nested loops.

  2. Efficient string manipulation: Instead of using re.sub() which searches the entire string again, the optimized version uses finditer() to get match positions directly, then performs string slicing (source[:start] + source[end:]) to remove matched functions. This avoids the overhead of regex substitution.

  3. Early termination: After finding and removing a function match, the code breaks from the inner loop since only one match per function is expected, preventing unnecessary continued iteration.

Performance impact by test case:

  • The optimizations are most effective for scenarios with multiple test functions to remove across multiple generated tests (the typical use case)
  • For edge cases like empty test lists, there's minimal overhead from pre-compilation but no significant benefit
  • The approach maintains correct behavior for decorated functions (skipping @pytest.mark.parametrize functions as intended)

The line profiler shows the regex compilation time dropped from 43.4% to being absorbed into the 89.8% upfront compilation cost, while the substitution overhead (51.7% in original) is eliminated entirely.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 5 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 1 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_remove_functions_from_generated_tests.py::test_keep_parametrized_tests 486μs 421μs 15.4%✅
test_remove_functions_from_generated_tests.py::test_multiple_removals 368μs 269μs 36.8%✅
test_remove_functions_from_generated_tests.py::test_remove_complex_functions 348μs 270μs 29.0%✅
test_remove_functions_from_generated_tests.py::test_simple_removal 248μs 216μs 14.7%✅
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
from __future__ import annotations

import re
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import List

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from codeflash.code_utils.edit_generated_tests import \
    remove_functions_from_generated_tests


# Simulate codeflash.models.models.GeneratedTestsList for testing
@dataclass
class GeneratedTest:
    generated_original_test_source: str

@dataclass
class GeneratedTestsList:
    generated_tests: List[GeneratedTest] = field(default_factory=list)
from codeflash.code_utils.edit_generated_tests import \
    remove_functions_from_generated_tests

# unit tests

# ---- Basic Test Cases ----






def test_remove_function_with_decorator():
    # Should not remove functions decorated with @pytest.mark.parametrize
    source = (
        "@pytest.mark.parametrize('x', [1,2])\n"
        "def test_one(x):\n    assert x in [1,2]\n"
        "def test_two():\n    assert True\n"
    )
    tests_list = GeneratedTestsList([GeneratedTest(source)])
    codeflash_output = remove_functions_from_generated_tests(tests_list, ["test_one"]); result = codeflash_output












def test_empty_generated_tests_list():
    # Should handle empty GeneratedTestsList gracefully
    tests_list = GeneratedTestsList([])
    codeflash_output = remove_functions_from_generated_tests(tests_list, ["test_one"]); result = codeflash_output # 9.29μs -> 11.8μs (21.5% slower)






#------------------------------------------------
from __future__ import annotations

import re
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import List

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from codeflash.code_utils.edit_generated_tests import \
    remove_functions_from_generated_tests


# Simulate the GeneratedTestsList and its elements
@dataclass
class GeneratedTest:
    generated_original_test_source: str

@dataclass
class GeneratedTestsList:
    generated_tests: List[GeneratedTest]
from codeflash.code_utils.edit_generated_tests import \
    remove_functions_from_generated_tests

# ==========================
# Unit Tests
# ==========================

# BASIC TEST CASES







def test_remove_function_with_decorator_edge():
    # Should NOT remove parametrized tests
    source = (
        "@pytest.mark.parametrize('x', [1,2,3])\ndef test_param(x):\n    assert x\n"
        "def test_normal():\n    assert True\n"
    )
    gtl = GeneratedTestsList([GeneratedTest(source)])
    codeflash_output = remove_functions_from_generated_tests(gtl, ["test_param", "test_normal"]); result = codeflash_output
    s = result.generated_tests[0].generated_original_test_source

def test_remove_function_with_multiline_decorator_edge():
    # Should NOT remove parametrized tests with multiline decorators
    source = (
        "@pytest.mark.parametrize(\n    'x', [1,2,3]\n)\ndef test_param(x):\n    assert x\n"
        "def test_normal():\n    assert True\n"
    )
    gtl = GeneratedTestsList([GeneratedTest(source)])
    codeflash_output = remove_functions_from_generated_tests(gtl, ["test_param", "test_normal"]); result = codeflash_output
    s = result.generated_tests[0].generated_original_test_source

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr769-2025-09-27T01.33.17 and push.

Codeflash

The optimization achieves a 22% speedup by eliminating redundant regex compilation and reducing unnecessary string operations.

**Key optimizations:**

1. **Pre-compiled regex patterns**: The original code compiled the same regex pattern multiple times (3,114 compilations taking 43.4% of total time). The optimized version compiles each pattern only once upfront using `_compile_function_patterns()`, moving this expensive operation outside the nested loops.

2. **Efficient string manipulation**: Instead of using `re.sub()` which searches the entire string again, the optimized version uses `finditer()` to get match positions directly, then performs string slicing (`source[:start] + source[end:]`) to remove matched functions. This avoids the overhead of regex substitution.

3. **Early termination**: After finding and removing a function match, the code breaks from the inner loop since only one match per function is expected, preventing unnecessary continued iteration.

**Performance impact by test case:**
- The optimizations are most effective for scenarios with multiple test functions to remove across multiple generated tests (the typical use case)
- For edge cases like empty test lists, there's minimal overhead from pre-compilation but no significant benefit
- The approach maintains correct behavior for decorated functions (skipping `@pytest.mark.parametrize` functions as intended)

The line profiler shows the regex compilation time dropped from 43.4% to being absorbed into the 89.8% upfront compilation cost, while the substitution overhead (51.7% in original) is eliminated entirely.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Sep 27, 2025
@KRRT7 KRRT7 merged commit e27c133 into clean-async-branch Sep 27, 2025
16 of 20 checks passed
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot deleted the codeflash/optimize-pr769-2025-09-27T01.33.17 branch September 27, 2025 02:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant