⚡️ Speed up function generate_candidates by 4,183% in PR #363 (part-1-windows-fixes)
#783
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #363
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
part-1-windows-fixes.📄 4,183% (41.83x) speedup for
generate_candidatesincodeflash/code_utils/coverage_utils.py⏱️ Runtime :
245 milliseconds→5.73 milliseconds(best of36runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 4182% speedup by eliminating expensive Path object creation and manipulation within the loop.
Key optimizations:
Pre-compute path parts: Instead of repeatedly calling
current_path.parentand creating new Path objects, the code usessource_code_path.partsto get all path components upfront as a tuple.Replace Path operations with string concatenation: The original code's bottleneck was
(Path(current_path.name) / last_added).as_posix()which created Path objects and converted them to POSIX format in every iteration. The optimized version uses simple f-string formatting:f"{parts[i]}/{last_added}".Index-based iteration: Rather than walking up the directory tree using
current_path.parent, it uses a reverse range loop over the parts indices, which is much faster than Path navigation.Performance impact by test case type:
The line profiler confirms the original bottleneck: 94.3% of time was spent on Path object creation (
candidate_path = (Path(current_path.name) / last_added).as_posix()), which is now replaced with lightweight string operations.✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
test_code_utils.py::test_generate_candidates🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_f8a6zz_s/tmpwxgbfa1y/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_generate_candidatesTo edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr363-2025-09-29T22.03.01and push.