⚡️ Speed up function image_rotation by 2,214%
#208
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 2,214% (22.14x) speedup for
image_rotationinsrc/signal/image.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.44 seconds→62.1 milliseconds(best of21runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 22x speedup by replacing nested Python loops with vectorized NumPy operations. Here's why this transformation is so effective:
Key Optimization: Vectorization
What changed:
forloops iterating over ~2.1 million pixels (for typical test images), performing scalar arithmetic and array indexing at each iterationnp.meshgrid()to create coordinate grids, then performs all transformations as array operations in a single passWhy it's faster:
Eliminates Python interpreter overhead: The original code spends 70% of runtime in loop overhead and scalar operations (lines with
for,offset_y = y - new_center_y, etc.). Vectorization moves computation to compiled C code in NumPy.SIMD and cache efficiency: NumPy operations leverage CPU vectorization (SIMD instructions) and better cache locality by processing contiguous memory blocks, versus scattered memory access in nested loops.
Reduces per-pixel overhead: The line profiler shows the original code spends 785-833ns per pixel just computing
original_yandoriginal_x. The optimized version does all ~2M transformations in 13.8ms total (6.5ns per pixel) - a 120x improvement for the transformation step alone.Performance Characteristics
Small images (< 10x10 pixels): The optimization is 60-86% slower due to NumPy array allocation overhead exceeding the benefit of vectorization. This is evident in tests like
test_single_pixel_image(7μs → 36μs).Large images (≥ 100x100 pixels): The optimization shines with 19-29x speedups:
test_large_square_image_rotation_90: 7.38ms → 365μs (19x faster)test_large_rectangular_image_rotation_45: 26.7ms → 905μs (28x faster)test_large_image_non_multiple_of_90: 250ms → 9.33ms (26x faster)Impact Assessment
When this matters:
Trade-offs:
The optimization transforms this from an O(n²) Python loop bottleneck into an O(n²) vectorized operation that leverages hardware acceleration, making it suitable for production image processing workloads.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-image_rotation-mji14qzzand push.