Skip to content

Conversation

codeflash-ai[bot]
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Aug 29, 2025

📄 58% (0.58x) speedup for manga in src/async_examples/concurrency.py

⏱️ Runtime : 44.3 seconds 28.0 seconds (best of 5 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimized code achieves a 58% speedup by transforming sequential execution into concurrent execution using asyncio.gather() and thread pool execution.

Key optimizations:

  1. Concurrent execution with asyncio.gather(): Instead of awaiting the API call first, then doing sync work sequentially, both tasks now run concurrently. The async API call (0.3s sleep) overlaps with the sync work (0.5s sleep + computation).

  2. Thread pool execution for blocking operations: The sync work (time.sleep() and sum()) is moved to loop.run_in_executor(None, sync_task), which runs it in a separate thread. This prevents blocking the async event loop during the 0.5s sleep and CPU-bound sum calculation.

  3. Parallelism within each iteration: Each loop iteration now takes ~max(0.3s, 0.5s + computation) = ~0.5s instead of 0.3s + 0.5s + computation = ~0.8s+.

Performance analysis from profiling:

  • Original: 99.7% of time spent in blocking time.sleep(0.5) calls (30 billion nanoseconds)
  • Optimized: The blocking operations now run in threads, with the main bottleneck being the executor overhead (65.4% of time in run_in_executor)

Best for test cases with:

  • Mixed async/sync workloads that can benefit from concurrent execution
  • Blocking I/O or CPU-bound tasks that can be offloaded to thread pools
  • Scenarios where the async and sync portions have overlapping execution time

The optimization maintains identical behavior and results while dramatically reducing wall-clock time through better concurrency patterns.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 13 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
import asyncio
import time

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.async_examples.concurrency import manga

# unit tests

# --- Basic Test Cases ---

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_manga_basic_length_and_types():
    # Test that manga returns a list of length 10 (5 async + 5 sync)
    result = await manga()
    # Check alternating pattern of async/sync results
    for i in range(5):
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_manga_basic_content():
    # Check specific content for the first and last elements
    result = await manga()
    # Check the sum value is correct
    expected_sum = sum(range(1000))
    for i in range(5):
        sync_msg = f"Sync task {i} completed with sum: {expected_sum}"

# --- Edge Test Cases ---

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_manga_edge_async_timing():
    # Test that async calls are awaited (not run in parallel)
    # Measure total time; should be at least (0.3 + 0.5)*5 seconds
    start = time.time()
    await manga()
    elapsed = time.time() - start
    min_expected = (0.3 + 0.5) * 5

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async 
#------------------------------------------------
import asyncio
import time

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.async_examples.concurrency import manga

# unit tests

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_manga_basic_output_structure():
    """
    Basic test: Ensure manga returns a list of the correct length and order.
    """
    result = await manga()
    # Check alternating pattern
    for i in range(5):
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_manga_sync_sum_correctness():
    """
    Basic test: Ensure the sum in the sync message is correct.
    """
    result = await manga()
    expected_sum = sum(range(1000))
    for i in range(5):
        sync_msg = result[2*i+1]

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_manga_edge_zero_iterations(monkeypatch):
    """
    Edge case: Patch manga to run 0 iterations, should return empty list.
    """
    async def manga_zero():
        results = []
        for i in range(0):
            async_result = await fake_api_call(0.3, f"async_{i}")
            results.append(async_result)
            time.sleep(0.5)
            summer = sum(range(1000))
            results.append(f"Sync task {i} completed with sum: {summer}")
        return results
    result = await manga_zero()

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async 
#------------------------------------------------
from src.async_examples.concurrency import manga

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-manga-mew2ookw and push.

Codeflash

The optimized code achieves a **58% speedup** by transforming sequential execution into concurrent execution using `asyncio.gather()` and thread pool execution.

**Key optimizations:**

1. **Concurrent execution with `asyncio.gather()`**: Instead of awaiting the API call first, then doing sync work sequentially, both tasks now run concurrently. The async API call (0.3s sleep) overlaps with the sync work (0.5s sleep + computation).

2. **Thread pool execution for blocking operations**: The sync work (`time.sleep()` and `sum()`) is moved to `loop.run_in_executor(None, sync_task)`, which runs it in a separate thread. This prevents blocking the async event loop during the 0.5s sleep and CPU-bound sum calculation.

3. **Parallelism within each iteration**: Each loop iteration now takes ~max(0.3s, 0.5s + computation) = ~0.5s instead of 0.3s + 0.5s + computation = ~0.8s+.

**Performance analysis from profiling:**
- Original: 99.7% of time spent in blocking `time.sleep(0.5)` calls (30 billion nanoseconds)
- Optimized: The blocking operations now run in threads, with the main bottleneck being the executor overhead (65.4% of time in `run_in_executor`)

**Best for test cases with:**
- Mixed async/sync workloads that can benefit from concurrent execution
- Blocking I/O or CPU-bound tasks that can be offloaded to thread pools
- Scenarios where the async and sync portions have overlapping execution time

The optimization maintains identical behavior and results while dramatically reducing wall-clock time through better concurrency patterns.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Aug 29, 2025
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from KRRT7 August 29, 2025 00:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants