Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed a bug in PropertyIndex.hashCode() where property values were ignored due to an invalid bitwise shift operation (b >>> 32 on an int). Changed the accumulation logic to correctly include the property's hash code. Verified the fix with a reproduction test case.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 8831129294899643843 started by @shai-almog

This commit fixes a bug in `PropertyIndex.hashCode()` where a 32-bit integer was being shifted by 32 bits (`b >>> 32`). In Java, shifting an `int` by 32 is a no-op (mod 32), leading to `b ^ b` which results in 0. This caused the property values to be effectively ignored in the hash code calculation.

The fix removes the invalid shift and XOR operation, using the property hash code directly (`value = 31 * value + b`), which is the standard way to accumulate hash codes. This ensures that `PropertyIndex` objects with different property values have different hash codes.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

@github-actions
Copy link

✅ Continuous Quality Report

Test & Coverage

Static Analysis

Generated automatically by the PR CI workflow.

@shai-almog
Copy link
Collaborator

shai-almog commented Dec 19, 2025

Compared 30 screenshots: 30 matched.

Native Android coverage

  • 📊 Line coverage: 24.62% (2626/10667 lines covered) [HTML preview] (artifact android-coverage-report, jacocoAndroidReport/html/index.html)
    • Other counters: instruction 24.28% (12222/50336), branch 15.19% (705/4640), complexity 17.35% (732/4220), method 32.67% (593/1815), class 34.65% (105/303)
    • Lowest covered classes
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidContactsManager – 0.00% (0/400 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidImplementation$Video – 0.00% (0/168 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.IntentIntegrator – 0.00% (0/139 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.util.com.codename1.impl.android.util.Base64 – 0.00% (0/117 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidImplementation$SocketImpl – 0.00% (0/77 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidTextureView – 0.00% (0/76 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidSurfaceView – 0.00% (0/73 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.LocalNotificationPublisher – 0.00% (0/65 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.FridaDetectionUtil – 0.00% (0/64 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidDB – 0.00% (0/57 lines covered)

✅ Native Android screenshot tests passed.

Native Android coverage

  • 📊 Line coverage: 24.62% (2626/10667 lines covered) [HTML preview] (artifact android-coverage-report, jacocoAndroidReport/html/index.html)
    • Other counters: instruction 24.28% (12222/50336), branch 15.19% (705/4640), complexity 17.35% (732/4220), method 32.67% (593/1815), class 34.65% (105/303)
    • Lowest covered classes
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidContactsManager – 0.00% (0/400 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidImplementation$Video – 0.00% (0/168 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.IntentIntegrator – 0.00% (0/139 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.util.com.codename1.impl.android.util.Base64 – 0.00% (0/117 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidImplementation$SocketImpl – 0.00% (0/77 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidTextureView – 0.00% (0/76 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidSurfaceView – 0.00% (0/73 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.LocalNotificationPublisher – 0.00% (0/65 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.FridaDetectionUtil – 0.00% (0/64 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidDB – 0.00% (0/57 lines covered)

@shai-almog
Copy link
Collaborator

shai-almog commented Dec 19, 2025

iOS screenshot updates

Compared 30 screenshots: 24 matched, 5 updated, 1 missing reference.

  • BrowserComponent — updated screenshot. Screenshot differs (1206x2622 px, bit depth 8).

    BrowserComponent
    Preview info: Preview provided by instrumentation.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as BrowserComponent.png in workflow artifacts.

  • graphics-draw-gradient — updated screenshot. Screenshot differs (1206x2622 px, bit depth 8).

    graphics-draw-gradient
    Preview info: JPEG preview quality 10; JPEG preview quality 10; downscaled to 844x1835.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as graphics-draw-gradient.png in workflow artifacts.

  • graphics-draw-round-rect — missing reference. Reference screenshot missing at /Users/runner/work/CodenameOne/CodenameOne/scripts/ios/screenshots/graphics-draw-round-rect.png.

    graphics-draw-round-rect
    Preview info: JPEG preview quality 10; JPEG preview quality 10; downscaled to 844x1835.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as graphics-draw-round-rect.png in workflow artifacts.

  • graphics-draw-string — updated screenshot. Screenshot differs (1206x2622 px, bit depth 8).

    graphics-draw-string
    Preview info: JPEG preview quality 10; JPEG preview quality 10; downscaled to 422x918.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as graphics-draw-string.png in workflow artifacts.

  • graphics-draw-string-decorated — updated screenshot. Screenshot differs (1206x2622 px, bit depth 8).

    graphics-draw-string-decorated
    Preview info: JPEG preview quality 10; JPEG preview quality 10; downscaled to 603x1311.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as graphics-draw-string-decorated.png in workflow artifacts.

  • kotlin — updated screenshot. Screenshot differs (1206x2622 px, bit depth 8).

    kotlin
    Preview info: Preview provided by instrumentation.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as kotlin.png in workflow artifacts.

Benchmark Results

  • VM Translation Time: 259 seconds
  • Compilation Time: 52 seconds

@shai-almog shai-almog marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2025 16:06
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@shai-almog shai-almog merged commit aebaf39 into master Dec 19, 2025
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants