-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 433
Fix invalid shift operation in PropertyIndex.hashCode #4314
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix invalid shift operation in PropertyIndex.hashCode #4314
Conversation
This commit fixes a bug in `PropertyIndex.hashCode()` where a 32-bit integer was being shifted by 32 bits (`b >>> 32`). In Java, shifting an `int` by 32 is a no-op (mod 32), leading to `b ^ b` which results in 0. This caused the property values to be effectively ignored in the hash code calculation. The fix removes the invalid shift and XOR operation, using the property hash code directly (`value = 31 * value + b`), which is the standard way to accumulate hash codes. This ensures that `PropertyIndex` objects with different property values have different hash codes.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. |
✅ Continuous Quality ReportTest & Coverage
Static Analysis
Generated automatically by the PR CI workflow. |
|
Compared 30 screenshots: 30 matched. Native Android coverage
✅ Native Android screenshot tests passed. Native Android coverage
|
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |






Fixed a bug in
PropertyIndex.hashCode()where property values were ignored due to an invalid bitwise shift operation (b >>> 32on anint). Changed the accumulation logic to correctly include the property's hash code. Verified the fix with a reproduction test case.PR created automatically by Jules for task 8831129294899643843 started by @shai-almog