-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
feat: add tests for routes #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
/refacto-test |
|
Refacto is reviewing this PR. Please wait for the review comments to be posted. |
| userId: session.user.id, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| return successResponse(createdDocument); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Input Validation: Missing timestamp parameter validation in document deletion endpoint. While the code checks for the presence of the timestamp parameter, it doesn't validate the format or range. This could lead to unintended document deletions with malformed timestamps.
Recommendation:
if (!timestamp) {
return apiErrors.missingParameter();
}
try {
const parsedTimestamp = new Date(timestamp);
if (isNaN(parsedTimestamp.getTime())) {
return apiErrors.invalidParameter('timestamp must be a valid date string');
}
} catch (error) {
return apiErrors.invalidParameter('timestamp must be a valid date string');
}|
|
||
| export const apiErrors = { | ||
| missingParameter: () => errorResponse(ERRORS.MISSING_PARAMETER, 400), | ||
| unauthorized: () => errorResponse(ERRORS.UNAUTHORIZED, 401), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Error Handling: The error response system is missing a specific error type for invalid parameters. Consider adding an 'invalidParameter' error type to provide more accurate error messages for validation failures.
Recommendation:
invalidParameter: (message = 'Invalid parameter') => errorResponse({ type: 'invalid_parameter', message }, 400),|
/refacto-test |
|
Refacto is reviewing this PR. Please wait for the review comments to be posted. |
Code Review: API Testing Error Handling Improvements👍 Well Done
📌 Files Processed
📝 Additional Comments
|
| try { | ||
| if (!fs.existsSync('playwright-report')) { | ||
| fs.mkdirSync('playwright-report', { recursive: true }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing Error Handling
The file system operation lacks error handling, which could cause the test runner to crash if directory creation fails due to permission issues or disk space limitations.
| try { | |
| if (!fs.existsSync('playwright-report')) { | |
| fs.mkdirSync('playwright-report', { recursive: true }); | |
| } | |
| 104: try { | |
| 105: if (!fs.existsSync('playwright-report')) { | |
| 106: fs.mkdirSync('playwright-report', { recursive: true }); | |
| 107: } | |
| 108: } catch (error) { | |
| 109: console.error('Failed to create playwright-report directory:', error); | |
| 110: // Continue execution as the directory might already exist or be created by Playwright | |
| 111: } |
Standards
- ISO-IEC-25010-Reliability-Fault-Tolerance
- SRE-Error-Handling
| main().catch((error) => { | ||
| console.error('Unhandled error:', error); | ||
| process.exit(1); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unhandled Promise Rejection
The main function's catch handler logs the error but doesn't ensure process termination if an unhandled promise rejection occurs within nested async operations.
| main().catch((error) => { | |
| console.error('Unhandled error:', error); | |
| process.exit(1); | |
| }); | |
| 155: +process.on('unhandledRejection', (reason) => { | |
| 156: + console.error('Unhandled Promise Rejection:', reason); | |
| 157: + process.exit(1); | |
| 158: +}); | |
| 159: + | |
| 160: +main().catch((error) => { | |
| 161: + console.error('Unhandled error:', error); | |
| 162: + process.exit(1); | |
| 163: +}); |
Standards
- ISO-IEC-25010-Reliability-Recoverability
- SRE-Error-Propagation
| const [createdDocument] = await saveDocument({ | ||
| id, | ||
| content, | ||
| title, | ||
| kind, | ||
| userId: session.user.id, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| return successResponse(createdDocument); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing Error Handling
The saveDocument operation lacks error handling, which could result in unhandled promise rejections if the database operation fails, causing the API to crash instead of returning an error response.
| const [createdDocument] = await saveDocument({ | |
| id, | |
| content, | |
| title, | |
| kind, | |
| userId: session.user.id, | |
| }); | |
| return successResponse(createdDocument); | |
| 74: + try { | |
| 75: + const [createdDocument] = await saveDocument({ | |
| 76: + id, | |
| 77: + content, | |
| 78: + title, | |
| 79: + kind, | |
| 80: + userId: session.user.id, | |
| 81: + }); | |
| 82: + | |
| 83: + return successResponse(createdDocument); | |
| 84: + } catch (error) { | |
| 85: + console.error('Failed to save document:', error); | |
| 86: + return apiErrors.serverError(); | |
| 87: + } |
Standards
- ISO-IEC-25010-Reliability-Fault-Tolerance
- SRE-Graceful-Degradation
No description provided.