Clone kafka 18894 #37
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@DDShantanuBadmanji has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (13)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
The user @DDShantanuBadmanji does not have an active seat allocated for code reviews. Please contact your organization admin to assign a seat or upgrade your subscription. |
Summary of ChangesHello @DDShantanuBadmanji, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a significant architectural enhancement by wrapping ConfigProvider instances in a generic Plugin object. This change streamlines the management of configuration providers, ensuring a more uniform lifecycle and enabling them to seamlessly integrate with Kafka's metrics system. By allowing ConfigProviders to implement the Monitorable interface, this PR improves the observability of custom configuration providers, making it easier to monitor their performance and health within Kafka Connect and other Kafka client applications. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces monitoring capabilities for ConfigProvider implementations by wrapping them in a Plugin object. This allows ConfigProviders that implement the Monitorable interface to register their own metrics. The changes involve refactoring various parts of the codebase, including AbstractConfig, ConfigTransformer, and several classes in the connect module, to use Plugin<ConfigProvider> instead of the raw ConfigProvider. The changes are well-contained and include corresponding updates to tests, as well as new tests for the monitoring functionality. My feedback includes one correction to ensure metric tags are consistent across different instantiation paths.
| ConfigProvider provider = Utils.newInstance(entry.getValue(), ConfigProvider.class); | ||
| provider.configure(configProperties); | ||
| configProviderInstances.put(entry.getKey(), provider); | ||
| Plugin<ConfigProvider> providerPlugin = Plugin.wrapInstance(provider, null, CONFIG_PROVIDERS_CONFIG); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The Plugin.wrapInstance call is missing the provider tag for metrics. The documentation for ConfigProvider states that a provider tag with the provider name will be automatically added to all registered metrics. This is not happening here, which will lead to inconsistent metric tags for config providers instantiated via AbstractConfig. The provider name is available as entry.getKey().
| Plugin<ConfigProvider> providerPlugin = Plugin.wrapInstance(provider, null, CONFIG_PROVIDERS_CONFIG); | |
| Plugin<ConfigProvider> providerPlugin = Plugin.wrapInstance(provider, null, CONFIG_PROVIDERS_CONFIG, Map.of("provider", entry.getKey())); |
2 participants
Delete this text and replace it with a detailed description of your change. The
PR title and body will become the squashed commit message.
If you would like to tag individuals, add some commentary, upload images, or
include other supplemental information that should not be part of the eventual
commit message, please use a separate comment.
If applicable, please include a summary of the testing strategy (including
rationale) for the proposed change. Unit and/or integration tests are expected
for any behavior change and system tests should be considered for larger
changes.