-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Create t.py #25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Create t.py #25
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||||||
| a=5 | ||||||
| b=5 | ||||||
| sum(a+b) | ||||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ❓ Verification inconclusiveFix import-time crash: sum() expects an iterable, not an int.
Apply this minimal fix: -sum(a+b)
+TOTAL = a + bVerify: 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
python - <<'PY'
import t
assert t.TOTAL == 10
print("OK")
PYLength of output: 179 Fix import-time crash: replace sum(a+b) with assignment sum() expects an iterable; sum(a+b) evaluates to an int and raises TypeError at import. -sum(a+b)
+TOTAL = a + bVerify: python - <<'PY'
import t
assert t.TOTAL == 10
print("OK")
PY🤖 Prompt for AI AgentsThere was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Unused Sum CalculationFunction call computes sum but result is discarded without assignment or return. This creates dead code that wastes computation cycles and provides no functional value. Standards
Comment on lines
+1
to
+3
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Missing Whitespace StandardsAssignment operators and function parameters lack proper spacing around operators. This violates PEP 8 style guidelines and reduces code readability for team collaboration. Standards
|
||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code does not follow PEP 8 style guidelines for whitespace around operators. There should be a single space on either side of the assignment operator (
=) for better readability.1Style Guide References
Footnotes
PEP 8: E225 missing whitespace around operator. It is recommended to use a single space around operators to improve readability. ↩