TeamTable changes #37
Conversation
|
CodeAnt AI is reviewing your PR. Thanks for using CodeAnt! 🎉We're free for open-source projects. if you're enjoying it, help us grow by sharing. Share on X · |
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Your free trial has ended. If you'd like to continue receiving code reviews, you can add a payment method here.
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughA new React component Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Parent as Parent Component
participant TeamView as TeamView
participant API as API
participant QueryCache as Query Cache
Parent->>TeamView: Mount with props
TeamView->>API: useFetchTeams()
API-->>TeamView: Team data
TeamView->>TeamView: Render data grid
TeamView->>Parent: setTeamLength(count)
rect rgb(200, 220, 255)
Note over TeamView: User Action: Delete Team
TeamView->>TeamView: Show confirmation
activate TeamView
TeamView->>API: DELETE /team/:id
API-->>TeamView: Success/Error
TeamView->>QueryCache: Invalidate queries
QueryCache-->>TeamView: Refresh data
TeamView->>Parent: setTeamLength(updated)
deactivate TeamView
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @visz11, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a new Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
/refacto-visz |
codeant-ai
bot
added
the
size:L
TeamTable changesTL;DR: Adds a comprehensive team management table component with hierarchical team display, member management, and configuration status tracking. Refacto PR SummaryImplements a complete team management interface using React Table with expandable rows, member counting, and configuration status visualization. Change HighlightsClick to expand
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant TT as TeamTable
participant API as API Client
participant QC as Query Client
participant DB as Database
U->>TT: Load team view
TT->>API: useFetchTeams(team)
API->>DB: GET teams data
DB-->>API: Teams with subteams
API-->>TT: Teams data
TT->>TT: Build hierarchical rows
TT-->>U: Display team table
U->>TT: Click delete team
TT->>TT: Validate subteams
TT->>API: DELETE /v1/team/{orgId}/{name}
API->>DB: Remove team
DB-->>API: Success response
API-->>TT: Deletion confirmed
TT->>QC: Invalidate queries
QC->>TT: Refresh data
TT-->>U: Updated table view
Testing GuideClick to expand
|
|
Refacto is reviewing this PR. Please wait for the review comments to be posted. |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new TeamTable.tsx component for displaying team information in a data grid. The implementation is mostly solid, but there are several areas for improvement regarding TypeScript best practices, React performance optimizations, code clarity, accessibility, and security. Key issues include widespread use of the any type, incorrect usage of useMemo, repetitive code blocks, an accessibility issue with an aria-label, and a security concern with storing tokens in localStorage. I've provided specific suggestions to address these points.
| interface TeamViewProps { | ||
| team: string; | ||
| setTeamLength: any; | ||
| appState?: any; | ||
| teamLength?: number; | ||
| plan?: string; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Throughout the component, the any type is used for props (setTeamLength, appState), state (rows), and generic type arguments (createColumnHelper<any>). This practice negates the benefits of TypeScript, such as type safety and improved developer experience. It's highly recommended to define and use specific interfaces for your data structures.
For example:
setTeamLengthcould be(length: number) => void.- A
Teaminterface should be defined for the data fromuseFetchTeamsand used forrowsandcreateColumnHelper<Team>.
| headers: { | ||
| Accept: 'application/json', | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | ||
| authorization: `bearer ${localStorage.getItem('token')}`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Storing sensitive information like authentication tokens in localStorage is a security risk as it's vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. An attacker could steal the token and impersonate the user. Consider using httpOnly cookies for storing tokens, which are not accessible via JavaScript.
| const columns = useMemo( | ||
| () => [ | ||
| columnHelper.accessor('name', { | ||
| cell: (info) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <Box pl={`${info.row.depth * 3}rem`}> | ||
| {info.row.getCanExpand() ? ( | ||
| <> | ||
| <Button | ||
| variant={'unstyled'} | ||
| minWidth={0} | ||
| onClick={info.row.getToggleExpandedHandler()} | ||
| > | ||
| {info.row.getIsExpanded() ? ( | ||
| <AiOutlineMinusSquare | ||
| size={18} | ||
| color={colors.text.primary} | ||
| /> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <AiOutlinePlusSquare | ||
| size={18} | ||
| color={colors.text.primary} | ||
| /> | ||
| )} | ||
| </Button> | ||
| </> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| '' | ||
| )}{' '} | ||
| {info.getValue()} | ||
| </Box> | ||
| ); | ||
| }, | ||
| header: 'Team Name', | ||
| }), | ||
|
|
||
| columnHelper.accessor('description', { | ||
| cell: (info) => { | ||
| if (!info.getValue()) { | ||
| return <Box color="orange.600">No Description Added</Box>; | ||
| } else { | ||
| return info.getValue(); | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| header: 'Description', | ||
| size: 360, | ||
| }), | ||
|
|
||
| columnHelper.accessor('managers', { | ||
| cell: (info) => { | ||
| let count = 0; | ||
| info.row.original.subTeams.forEach((item: any) => { | ||
| count += item.managers.length; | ||
| }); | ||
| return ( | ||
| <Flex flexWrap="wrap"> | ||
| {info?.getValue()?.length > 0 ? ( | ||
| <Box> | ||
| {info?.getValue()?.map((item: string, idx: number) => ( | ||
| <Text mr={2} key={`manager-${idx}`}> | ||
| {item} | ||
| {info.getValue().length - 1 !== idx && ','} | ||
| </Text> | ||
| ))} | ||
| {info.row.original.subTeams.length > 0 ? ( | ||
| <Text>+{count} in subteams</Text> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| '' | ||
| )} | ||
| </Box> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Box> | ||
| <Text color={'gray.400'} fontFamily={'heading'}> | ||
| No Manager Assigned | ||
| </Text> | ||
| {info.row.original.subTeams.length > 0 ? ( | ||
| <Text>+{count} in subteams</Text> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| '' | ||
| )} | ||
| </Box> | ||
| )} | ||
| </Flex> | ||
| ); | ||
| }, | ||
| header: 'Managers', | ||
| }), | ||
| columnHelper.accessor('memberCount', { | ||
| cell: (info) => { | ||
| const rowData = info.row.original as any; | ||
| const managersCount = rowData?.managers | ||
| ? rowData?.managers.length | ||
| : 0; | ||
| const membersCount = rowData?.memberCount ? rowData?.memberCount : 0; | ||
| const subTeamsCount = rowData?.subTeams ? rowData.subTeams.length : 0; | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| return ( | ||
| <Flex | ||
| flexDirection="column" | ||
| gap="2" | ||
| width="100px" | ||
| alignItems="flex-start" | ||
| > | ||
| <Text>{managersCount} Managers</Text> | ||
| <Text>{membersCount} Members</Text> | ||
| <Text>{subTeamsCount} Subteams</Text> | ||
| </Flex> | ||
| ); | ||
| }, | ||
| header: 'Members', | ||
| size: 50, | ||
| meta: { | ||
| isNumeric: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| }), | ||
| columnHelper.accessor('setupStates', { | ||
| cell: (info) => ( | ||
| <UnorderedList listStyleType={'none'}> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Communication ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| Communication | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Dora ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| DORA | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Issue ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| Issue | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Git ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| Git | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| </UnorderedList> | ||
| ), | ||
| header: 'Config Status', | ||
| }), | ||
|
|
||
| columnHelper.accessor('actions', { | ||
| cell: (info) => ( | ||
| <Flex> | ||
| <Tooltip label="Edit" hasArrow> | ||
| <IconButton | ||
| aria-label="edit" | ||
| bg="transparent" | ||
| size="sm" | ||
| color="text.secondary" | ||
| icon={<MdOutlineEdit size={16} />} | ||
| position={'static'} | ||
| onClick={(e) => { | ||
| e.preventDefault(); | ||
| e.stopPropagation(); | ||
| navigate(`/settings/teams/${info.row.original?.name}`); | ||
| }} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Tooltip> | ||
|
|
||
| <ConfirmButton | ||
| buttonText="Delete" | ||
| showIcon | ||
| bodyText={`Do you really want to delete this team - ${info.row.original?.name}?`} | ||
| headerText="Are you sure?" | ||
| onSuccessAction={() => { | ||
| if (info.row.original.subTeams.length >= 1) { | ||
| newToast({ | ||
| message: | ||
| 'Cannot delete top level team if sub teams available.', | ||
| status: 'error', | ||
| }); | ||
| } else { | ||
| handleDelete(info.row.original?.name); | ||
| } | ||
| }} | ||
| /> | ||
|
|
||
| <Tooltip label="Add Member" hasArrow> | ||
| <IconButton | ||
| aria-label="edit" | ||
| size="sm" | ||
| bg="transparent" | ||
| color="primary" | ||
| icon={<MdPersonAddAlt size={16} />} | ||
| position={'static'} | ||
| onClick={(e) => { | ||
| e.preventDefault(); | ||
| e.stopPropagation(); | ||
| navigate(`/settings/teams/${info.row.original?.name}`, { | ||
| state: { tab: 1 }, | ||
| }); | ||
| }} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Tooltip> | ||
| </Flex> | ||
| ), | ||
| header: 'Actions', | ||
| }), | ||
| ], | ||
| [teamsData?.dto] | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The useMemo hook for columns is not being used effectively, which can lead to performance issues.
- The dependency array
[teamsData?.dto]is incorrect. The column definitions don't depend on the data itself, causing unnecessary recalculations when data changes. - The
handleDeletefunction, used within the 'Actions' column, is defined after thisuseMemoblock and is not wrapped inuseCallback. This means it's recreated on every render, which would break memoization.
To fix this, you should:
- Move the
handleDeletefunction definition to be before thecolumnsuseMemoblock. - Wrap
handleDeleteinReact.useCallbackwith its dependencies (e.g.,[queryClient, newToast]). - Update the
useMemodependency array forcolumnsto include its actual dependencies, like[colors, navigate, newToast, handleDelete].
| cell: (info) => { | ||
| let count = 0; | ||
| info.row.original.subTeams.forEach((item: any) => { | ||
| count += item.managers.length; | ||
| }); | ||
| return ( | ||
| <Flex flexWrap="wrap"> | ||
| {info?.getValue()?.length > 0 ? ( | ||
| <Box> | ||
| {info?.getValue()?.map((item: string, idx: number) => ( | ||
| <Text mr={2} key={`manager-${idx}`}> | ||
| {item} | ||
| {info.getValue().length - 1 !== idx && ','} | ||
| </Text> | ||
| ))} | ||
| {info.row.original.subTeams.length > 0 ? ( | ||
| <Text>+{count} in subteams</Text> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| '' | ||
| )} | ||
| </Box> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Box> | ||
| <Text color={'gray.400'} fontFamily={'heading'}> | ||
| No Manager Assigned | ||
| </Text> | ||
| {info.row.original.subTeams.length > 0 ? ( | ||
| <Text>+{count} in subteams</Text> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| '' | ||
| )} | ||
| </Box> | ||
| )} | ||
| </Flex> | ||
| ); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for rendering managers is complex and likely has a rendering bug (managers will appear on separate lines because <Text> is a block element by default). It can be greatly simplified by using Array.prototype.join for the managers list and calculating the sub-team manager count with reduce. This also removes duplicated code.
cell: (info) => {
const managers = info.getValue() ?? [];
const subTeamManagerCount = info.row.original.subTeams.reduce(
(acc: number, team: any) => acc + team.managers.length,
0
);
return (
<Flex flexWrap="wrap" alignItems="baseline">
{managers.length > 0 ? (
<Text>{managers.join(', ')}</Text>
) : (
<Text color="gray.400" fontFamily="heading">
No Manager Assigned
</Text>
)}
{subTeamManagerCount > 0 && (
<Text ml={2}>+{subTeamManagerCount} in subteams</Text>
)}
</Flex>
);
},
| cell: (info) => ( | ||
| <UnorderedList listStyleType={'none'}> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Communication ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| Communication | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Dora ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| DORA | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Issue ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| Issue | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Git ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| Git | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| </UnorderedList> | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code for rendering setup states is very repetitive. This can be made more concise and easier to maintain by iterating over an array of status configurations.
cell: (info) => {
const statuses = [
{ key: 'Communication', label: 'Communication' },
{ key: 'Dora', label: 'DORA' },
{ key: 'Issue', label: 'Issue' },
{ key: 'Git', label: 'Git' },
];
const setupValue = info.getValue();
return (
<UnorderedList listStyleType="none">
{statuses.map((status) => (
<ListItem display="flex" gap={1} key={status.key}>
<Image src={setupValue[status.key] ? Present : NotPresent} />
{status.label}
</ListItem>
))}
</UnorderedList>
);
},
|
|
||
| <Tooltip label="Add Member" hasArrow> | ||
| <IconButton | ||
| aria-label="edit" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The aria-label for this IconButton is "edit", which is incorrect for an "Add Member" action. This is misleading for users of assistive technologies. It should be updated to accurately describe the button's function.
aria-label="add member"
![codeant-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/646884?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| ListIcon, | ||
| ListItem, | ||
| Text, | ||
| Tooltip, | ||
| UnorderedList, | ||
| useTheme, | ||
| useToast, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Remove the unused imports ListIcon and useToast from the Chakra import to avoid dead code. [maintainability]
Severity Level: Minor
| ListIcon, | |
| ListItem, | |
| Text, | |
| Tooltip, | |
| UnorderedList, | |
| useTheme, | |
| useToast, | |
| ListItem, | |
| Text, | |
| Tooltip, | |
| UnorderedList, | |
| useTheme, |
Why it matters? ⭐
The import block in TeamTable.tsx (shown in the current file) includes ListIcon and useToast, neither of which are referenced anywhere else in the file. The file uses useToastHook (from @devd-client/devd/components) and newToast; there are no usages of Chakra's useToast or ListIcon. Removing them will eliminate dead imports and any linter warnings without changing runtime behavior.
Prompt for AI Agent 🤖
This is a comment left during a code review.
**Path:** TeamTable.tsx
**Line:** 6:12
**Comment:**
*Maintainability: Remove the unused imports `ListIcon` and `useToast` from the Chakra import to avoid dead code.
Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| Communication | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Dora ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| DORA | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Issue ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| Issue | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Git ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Add descriptive alt attributes to the Image elements in the setup states cell for accessibility. [best practice]
Severity Level: Minor
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | |
| ) : ( | |
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | |
| )} | |
| Communication | |
| </ListItem> | |
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | |
| {info.getValue().Dora ? ( | |
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | |
| ) : ( | |
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | |
| )} | |
| DORA | |
| </ListItem> | |
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | |
| {info.getValue().Issue ? ( | |
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | |
| ) : ( | |
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | |
| )} | |
| Issue | |
| </ListItem> | |
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | |
| {info.getValue().Git ? ( | |
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | |
| ) : ( | |
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | |
| <Image src={Present} alt="Communication configured" /> | |
| ) : ( | |
| <Image src={NotPresent} alt="Communication not configured" /> | |
| )} | |
| Communication | |
| </ListItem> | |
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | |
| {info.getValue().Dora ? ( | |
| <Image src={Present} alt="DORA configured" /> | |
| ) : ( | |
| <Image src={NotPresent} alt="DORA not configured" /> | |
| )} | |
| DORA | |
| </ListItem> | |
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | |
| {info.getValue().Issue ? ( | |
| <Image src={Present} alt="Issue configured" /> | |
| ) : ( | |
| <Image src={NotPresent} alt="Issue not configured" /> | |
| )} | |
| Issue | |
| </ListItem> | |
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | |
| {info.getValue().Git ? ( | |
| <Image src={Present} alt="Git configured" /> | |
| ) : ( | |
| <Image src={NotPresent} alt="Git not configured" /> |
Why it matters? ⭐
The setup state icons are rendered with elements that currently lack alt attributes. Adding descriptive alt text (e.g., "Communication configured" / "Communication not configured") improves accessibility and removes potential JSX/ESLint warnings about missing alt on images. This change doesn't alter business logic and directly improves usability for assistive technologies.
Prompt for AI Agent 🤖
This is a comment left during a code review.
**Path:** TeamTable.tsx
**Line:** 186:212
**Comment:**
*Best Practice: Add descriptive `alt` attributes to the `Image` elements in the setup states cell for accessibility.
Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.
|
CodeAnt AI finished reviewing your PR. |
Code Review: TeamTable Security & Architecture Issues👍 Well Done
📁 Selected files for review (1)
🎯 Custom Instructions
📝 Additional Comments
|
![refacto-visz[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1889637?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| apiClient(`/v1/team/${localStorage.getItem('orgId')}/${name}`, { | ||
| method: 'DELETE', | ||
| headers: { | ||
| Accept: 'application/json', | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | ||
| authorization: `bearer ${localStorage.getItem('token')}`, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hardcoded Secrets Storage
Authentication token retrieved from localStorage without validation or encryption violates organization guideline requiring no hard-coded secrets or credentials. Attackers with XSS access can steal tokens enabling account takeover and unauthorized API access.
const secureAuth = useSecureAuth();
const { orgId, token } = await secureAuth.getValidatedCredentials();
if (!orgId || !token) {
throw new Error('Authentication required');
}
apiClient(`/v1/team/${orgId}/${name}`, {
method: 'DELETE',
headers: {
Accept: 'application/json',
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
authorization: `bearer ${token}`,
Commitable Suggestion
| apiClient(`/v1/team/${localStorage.getItem('orgId')}/${name}`, { | |
| method: 'DELETE', | |
| headers: { | |
| Accept: 'application/json', | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| authorization: `bearer ${localStorage.getItem('token')}`, | |
| }, | |
| const secureAuth = useSecureAuth(); | |
| const { orgId, token } = await secureAuth.getValidatedCredentials(); | |
| if (!orgId || !token) { | |
| throw new Error('Authentication required'); | |
| } | |
| apiClient(`/v1/team/${orgId}/${name}`, { | |
| method: 'DELETE', | |
| headers: { | |
| Accept: 'application/json', | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| authorization: `bearer ${token}`, |
Standards
- CWE-522
- OWASP-A02
- Org-Guideline-No hard-coded secrets or credentials
|
|
||
| const handleDelete = (name: string) => { | ||
| setLoading(true); | ||
| apiClient(`/v1/team/${localStorage.getItem('orgId')}/${name}`, { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing Input Validation
URL constructed with unsanitized parameters from localStorage and function parameter violates organization guideline to validate all external inputs. Path traversal or injection attacks possible through manipulated orgId or name values enabling unauthorized resource access.
const sanitizeInput = (input: string | null): string => {
if (!input || typeof input !== 'string') {
throw new Error('Invalid input');
}
return input.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9_-]/g, '');
};
const sanitizedOrgId = sanitizeInput(localStorage.getItem('orgId'));
const sanitizedName = sanitizeInput(name);
apiClient(`/v1/team/${sanitizedOrgId}/${sanitizedName}`, {
Commitable Suggestion
| apiClient(`/v1/team/${localStorage.getItem('orgId')}/${name}`, { | |
| const sanitizeInput = (input: string | null): string => { | |
| if (!input || typeof input !== 'string') { | |
| throw new Error('Invalid input'); | |
| } | |
| return input.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9_-]/g, ''); | |
| }; | |
| const sanitizedOrgId = sanitizeInput(localStorage.getItem('orgId')); | |
| const sanitizedName = sanitizeInput(name); | |
| apiClient(`/v1/team/${sanitizedOrgId}/${sanitizedName}`, { |
Standards
- CWE-20
- OWASP-A03
- Org-Guideline-Validate all external inputs
| plan?: string; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const TeamView: React.FC<TeamViewProps> = ({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
God Component Violation
Single component handles multiple unrelated responsibilities violating SRP. TeamView manages data fetching, UI rendering, delete operations, navigation, toast notifications, and column definitions. This creates tight coupling and makes changes risky across multiple domains.
const useTeamOperations = () => {
const queryClient = useQueryClient();
const [newToast] = useToastHook();
const [loading, setLoading] = React.useState(false);
const handleDelete = (name: string) => {
// Move delete logic here
};
return { handleDelete, loading };
};
const TeamView: React.FC<TeamViewProps> = ({ team, setTeamLength, appState, teamLength, plan }) => {
const { handleDelete, loading } = useTeamOperations();
const columns = useTeamColumns(handleDelete);
Commitable Suggestion
| const TeamView: React.FC<TeamViewProps> = ({ | |
| const useTeamOperations = () => { | |
| const queryClient = useQueryClient(); | |
| const [newToast] = useToastHook(); | |
| const [loading, setLoading] = React.useState(false); | |
| const handleDelete = (name: string) => { | |
| // Move delete logic here | |
| }; | |
| return { handleDelete, loading }; | |
| }; | |
| const TeamView: React.FC<TeamViewProps> = ({ team, setTeamLength, appState, teamLength, plan }) => { | |
| const { handleDelete, loading } = useTeamOperations(); | |
| const columns = useTeamColumns(handleDelete); |
Standards
- SOLID-SRP
- Clean-Code-Class-Organization
- Refactoring-Extract-Class
| let count = 0; | ||
| info.row.original.subTeams.forEach((item: any) => { | ||
| count += item.managers.length; | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistent Variable Usage
Logic error in manager count calculation: variable 'count' is calculated but never used in the display logic. The forEach loop accumulates manager counts from subteams but this calculated value doesn't affect the rendered output. This creates misleading code that suggests functionality that doesn't exist.
const subTeamManagerCount = info.row.original.subTeams.reduce((acc: number, item: any) => acc + item.managers.length, 0);
Commitable Suggestion
| let count = 0; | |
| info.row.original.subTeams.forEach((item: any) => { | |
| count += item.managers.length; | |
| }); | |
| const subTeamManagerCount = info.row.original.subTeams.reduce((acc: number, item: any) => acc + item.managers.length, 0); |
Standards
- Algorithm-Correctness-Variable-Usage
- Logic-Verification-Data-Flow
- Business-Rule-Display-Consistency
| let count = 0; | ||
| info.row.original.subTeams.forEach((item: any) => { | ||
| count += item.managers.length; | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
N+1 Query Pattern
Nested iteration over subTeams array within cell renderer creates O(n*m) complexity where n is team count and m is average subteams per team. This computation executes on every render causing performance degradation with large team hierarchies. Consider pre-computing manager counts during data transformation.
const subTeamManagerCount = info.row.original.subTeamManagerCount || 0;
Commitable Suggestion
| let count = 0; | |
| info.row.original.subTeams.forEach((item: any) => { | |
| count += item.managers.length; | |
| }); | |
| const subTeamManagerCount = info.row.original.subTeamManagerCount || 0; |
Standards
- ISO-IEC-25010-Performance-Efficiency-Time-Behavior
- Algorithmic-Complexity-Nested-Loop-Optimization
| {info.row.original.subTeams.length > 0 ? ( | ||
| <Text>+{count} in subteams</Text> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| '' | ||
| )} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Duplicate Computation Pattern
Duplicate conditional logic for subteams count display creates redundant DOM evaluations and increases render complexity. The same subTeams.length check and count display logic appears twice within the same cell renderer. Consolidate logic to reduce computational overhead and improve maintainability.
Standards
- ISO-IEC-25010-Performance-Efficiency-Resource-Utilization
- Optimization-Pattern-Code-Deduplication
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
TeamTable.tsx (3)
57-57: Add proper type definitions for better type safety.Both
rowsandcolumnHelperuseanytypes. Consider creating aTeaminterface that describes the structure of team data (with properties likename,description,managers,memberCount,subTeams,setupStates) and use it instead ofany.Also applies to: 63-63
160-161: Remove excessive whitespace.Lines 160-161 contain unnecessary blank lines that should be removed for better code consistency.
280-280: Consider adding handleDelete to dependency array.The
columnsuseMemo useshandleDeletebut doesn't include it in the dependency array. While this works becausehandleDeleteis recreated on every render, it's better practice to either:
- Include
handleDeletein the dependency array and wrap it withuseCallback, or- Move
handleDeleteinside theuseMemoif it's only used in column definitionsThis ensures the columns are recreated when
handleDeletechanges and follows React best practices.Example of wrapping with useCallback:
const handleDelete = useCallback(async (name: string) => { // ... existing implementation }, [queryClient, newToast]);Then update the dependency array:
], - [teamsData?.dto] + [teamsData?.dto, handleDelete, colors, navigate, newToast] );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
TeamTable.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
TeamTable.tsx (3)
101-111: Good handling of missing data.The fallback message for missing descriptions provides clear feedback to users.
246-255: Good validation logic for team deletion.The check to prevent deletion of teams with sub-teams is a good safeguard against data integrity issues. The user feedback via toast is clear and helpful.
317-333: LGTM!The render logic correctly handles loading states and passes appropriate props to the DataGrid component.
| interface TeamViewProps { | ||
| team: string; | ||
| setTeamLength: any; | ||
| appState?: any; | ||
| teamLength?: number; | ||
| plan?: string; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
Improve type safety for the interface.
Multiple properties are typed as any, which defeats TypeScript's type checking and can lead to runtime errors. Consider defining proper types:
setTeamLengthshould be typed as(length: number) => voidappStateshould have a proper type definition or interface- Consider creating a proper type for team data instead of using
anyin column helper
Apply this diff to improve the setTeamLength type:
interface TeamViewProps {
team: string;
- setTeamLength: any;
+ setTeamLength: (length: number) => void;
appState?: any;
teamLength?: number;
plan?: string;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| interface TeamViewProps { | |
| team: string; | |
| setTeamLength: any; | |
| appState?: any; | |
| teamLength?: number; | |
| plan?: string; | |
| } | |
| interface TeamViewProps { | |
| team: string; | |
| setTeamLength: (length: number) => void; | |
| appState?: any; | |
| teamLength?: number; | |
| plan?: string; | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In TeamTable.tsx around lines 34 to 40, the TeamViewProps interface uses several
any types; update setTeamLength to have the signature (length: number) => void,
replace appState: any with a specific interface/type (create AppState or import
existing type) and avoid any in other places by creating a Team type (e.g., Team
or TeamRow) and use it for props and column helpers; update any column helper
usages to reference the Team type so TypeScript can enforce correct field types.
| columnHelper.accessor('setupStates', { | ||
| cell: (info) => ( | ||
| <UnorderedList listStyleType={'none'}> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Communication ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| Communication | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Dora ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| DORA | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Issue ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| Issue | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| <ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}> | ||
| {info.getValue().Git ? ( | ||
| <Image src={Present}></Image> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Image src={NotPresent}></Image> | ||
| )} | ||
| Git | ||
| </ListItem> | ||
| </UnorderedList> | ||
| ), | ||
| header: 'Config Status', | ||
| }), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add alt text to images for accessibility.
The Image components are missing alt attributes, which is an accessibility issue that prevents screen readers from describing the setup status icons to visually impaired users.
Apply this diff to add alt attributes:
<ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}>
{info.getValue().Communication ? (
- <Image src={Present}></Image>
+ <Image src={Present} alt="Communication setup completed"></Image>
) : (
- <Image src={NotPresent}></Image>
+ <Image src={NotPresent} alt="Communication setup not completed"></Image>
)}
Communication
</ListItem>
<ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}>
{info.getValue().Dora ? (
- <Image src={Present}></Image>
+ <Image src={Present} alt="DORA setup completed"></Image>
) : (
- <Image src={NotPresent}></Image>
+ <Image src={NotPresent} alt="DORA setup not completed"></Image>
)}
DORA
</ListItem>
<ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}>
{info.getValue().Issue ? (
- <Image src={Present}></Image>
+ <Image src={Present} alt="Issue setup completed"></Image>
) : (
- <Image src={NotPresent}></Image>
+ <Image src={NotPresent} alt="Issue setup not completed"></Image>
)}
Issue
</ListItem>
<ListItem display={'flex'} gap={1}>
{info.getValue().Git ? (
- <Image src={Present}></Image>
+ <Image src={Present} alt="Git setup completed"></Image>
) : (
- <Image src={NotPresent}></Image>
+ <Image src={NotPresent} alt="Git setup not completed"></Image>
)}
Git
</ListItem>Additionally, consider refactoring this repetitive code using an array map to reduce duplication:
{['Communication', 'Dora', 'Issue', 'Git'].map((setupType) => (
<ListItem key={setupType} display={'flex'} gap={1}>
{info.getValue()[setupType] ? (
<Image src={Present} alt={`${setupType} setup completed`} />
) : (
<Image src={NotPresent} alt={`${setupType} setup not completed`} />
)}
{setupType === 'Dora' ? 'DORA' : setupType}
</ListItem>
))}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In TeamTable.tsx around lines 181 to 219, the Image components lack alt
attributes which is an accessibility issue; add descriptive alt text to every
<Image> (e.g., "Communication setup completed" / "Communication setup not
completed", etc.) so screen readers can convey status, and to reduce duplication
refactor the repeated ListItem blocks into a single map over an array like
['Communication','Dora','Issue','Git'] that renders each ListItem with the
correct alt text and uses 'DORA' for the display label when the key is 'Dora'.
| <Tooltip label="Add Member" hasArrow> | ||
| <IconButton | ||
| aria-label="edit" | ||
| size="sm" | ||
| bg="transparent" | ||
| color="primary" | ||
| icon={<MdPersonAddAlt size={16} />} | ||
| position={'static'} | ||
| onClick={(e) => { | ||
| e.preventDefault(); | ||
| e.stopPropagation(); | ||
| navigate(`/settings/teams/${info.row.original?.name}`, { | ||
| state: { tab: 1 }, | ||
| }); | ||
| }} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Tooltip> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect aria-label.
The "Add Member" button has aria-label="edit" which misrepresents its function to screen reader users.
Apply this diff:
<Tooltip label="Add Member" hasArrow>
<IconButton
- aria-label="edit"
+ aria-label="add member"
size="sm"
bg="transparent"
color="primary"
icon={<MdPersonAddAlt size={16} />}
position={'static'}
onClick={(e) => {
e.preventDefault();
e.stopPropagation();
navigate(`/settings/teams/${info.row.original?.name}`, {
state: { tab: 1 },
});
}}
/>
</Tooltip>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <Tooltip label="Add Member" hasArrow> | |
| <IconButton | |
| aria-label="edit" | |
| size="sm" | |
| bg="transparent" | |
| color="primary" | |
| icon={<MdPersonAddAlt size={16} />} | |
| position={'static'} | |
| onClick={(e) => { | |
| e.preventDefault(); | |
| e.stopPropagation(); | |
| navigate(`/settings/teams/${info.row.original?.name}`, { | |
| state: { tab: 1 }, | |
| }); | |
| }} | |
| /> | |
| </Tooltip> | |
| <Tooltip label="Add Member" hasArrow> | |
| <IconButton | |
| aria-label="add member" | |
| size="sm" | |
| bg="transparent" | |
| color="primary" | |
| icon={<MdPersonAddAlt size={16} />} | |
| position={'static'} | |
| onClick={(e) => { | |
| e.preventDefault(); | |
| e.stopPropagation(); | |
| navigate(`/settings/teams/${info.row.original?.name}`, { | |
| state: { tab: 1 }, | |
| }); | |
| }} | |
| /> | |
| </Tooltip> |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In TeamTable.tsx around lines 258 to 274, the IconButton for "Add Member"
incorrectly uses aria-label="edit"; change the aria-label to a descriptive,
accurate value such as "add member" (or "add team member") so screen readers
convey the correct action, and ensure the label is lower-case or title-cased
consistently with the app's accessibility conventions.
| const handleDelete = (name: string) => { | ||
| setLoading(true); | ||
| apiClient(`/v1/team/${localStorage.getItem('orgId')}/${name}`, { | ||
| method: 'DELETE', | ||
| headers: { | ||
| Accept: 'application/json', | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | ||
| authorization: `bearer ${localStorage.getItem('token')}`, | ||
| }, | ||
| }) | ||
| .then((res: any) => { | ||
| Promise.all([ | ||
| queryClient.invalidateQueries([QUERY_KEYS.teams]), | ||
| queryClient.invalidateQueries([TEAM_DETAILS_QUERY_KEYS.teamList]), | ||
| queryClient.invalidateQueries(['teamMenu']), | ||
| ]); | ||
|
|
||
| newToast({ | ||
| message: `"${name}" Team has been deleted successfully.`, | ||
| status: 'success', | ||
| }); | ||
| }) | ||
| .catch((err: any) => { | ||
| newToast({ | ||
| message: | ||
| err?.message ?? `Some error occurred while deleting ${name}.`, | ||
| status: 'error', | ||
| }); | ||
| }) | ||
| .finally(() => { | ||
| setLoading(false); | ||
| }); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Await query invalidation to ensure data consistency.
The Promise.all on lines 294-298 invalidates multiple queries but is not awaited, which means the success toast may appear before the UI is fully refreshed. This could lead to temporary inconsistent state where the deleted team still appears briefly.
Apply this diff:
.then((res: any) => {
- Promise.all([
+ await Promise.all([
queryClient.invalidateQueries([QUERY_KEYS.teams]),
queryClient.invalidateQueries([TEAM_DETAILS_QUERY_KEYS.teamList]),
queryClient.invalidateQueries(['teamMenu']),
]);
newToast({
message: `"${name}" Team has been deleted successfully.`,
status: 'success',
});
})And make the function async:
- const handleDelete = (name: string) => {
+ const handleDelete = async (name: string) => {Additionally, consider validating that the token and orgId exist before making the API call to provide better error handling if they're missing.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Locate TeamTable.tsx and verify the handleDelete function
fd -t f "TeamTable.tsx" --exec cat {}Length of output: 9768
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for how queryClient.invalidateQueries is used elsewhere in the codebase
rg -n "invalidateQueries" -A2 -B2 --type=tsx --type=tsLength of output: 27
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for async handleDelete patterns and Promise.all usage with await
rg -n "handleDelete|Promise\.all" -A3 -B1 --type=tsx --type=ts | head -100Length of output: 27
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for queryClient and invalidateQueries patterns without type flags
rg -n "invalidateQueries" -A2 -B2 | head -50Length of output: 381
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other promise patterns and async handlers in the codebase
rg -n "\.then\(" -A3 -B1 | head -80Length of output: 284
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check React Query package to understand invalidateQueries behavior
find . -name "package*.json" -type f -exec grep -l "react-query\|@tanstack/react-query" {} \;Length of output: 0
🌐 Web query:
React Query invalidateQueries return type promise behavior
💡 Result:
Short answer: invalidateQueries returns a Promise — it resolves when the (background) refetches it triggered are finished (or immediately if no refetch needed). So you can await it (e.g. return await queryClient.invalidateQueries(...) from an onSuccess) to keep a mutation pending until invalidation/refetch completes. [1][2][3]
Notes:
- You can control whether active/inactive queries refetch with options (refetchActive/refetchInactive) and whether the Promise throws on refetch errors (throwOnError). [2]
- Common pattern: await Promise.all([...invalidateQueries(...)]) when invalidating multiple keys. [1][3]
Sources:
[1] TanStack Query — Invalidations from Mutations (example using await).
[2] TanStack Query — QueryClient reference (invalidateQueries/refetch and Promise behavior/options).
[3] tkdodo / dev.to — explanation and examples showing invalidateQueries returns a Promise.
Await query invalidation to ensure data consistency.
The invalidateQueries calls return Promises that resolve when background refetches complete. Currently, Promise.all on lines 294-298 is not awaited, allowing the success toast to display before queries are actually invalidated and refetched. This creates a race condition where the deleted team may briefly reappear in the UI.
Apply this diff:
.then((res: any) => {
- Promise.all([
+ await Promise.all([
queryClient.invalidateQueries([QUERY_KEYS.teams]),
queryClient.invalidateQueries([TEAM_DETAILS_QUERY_KEYS.teamList]),
queryClient.invalidateQueries(['teamMenu']),
]);
newToast({
message: `"${name}" Team has been deleted successfully.`,
status: 'success',
});
})And make the function async:
- const handleDelete = (name: string) => {
+ const handleDelete = async (name: string) => {Additionally, validate that token and orgId exist before making the API call to catch missing credentials early.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const handleDelete = (name: string) => { | |
| setLoading(true); | |
| apiClient(`/v1/team/${localStorage.getItem('orgId')}/${name}`, { | |
| method: 'DELETE', | |
| headers: { | |
| Accept: 'application/json', | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| authorization: `bearer ${localStorage.getItem('token')}`, | |
| }, | |
| }) | |
| .then((res: any) => { | |
| Promise.all([ | |
| queryClient.invalidateQueries([QUERY_KEYS.teams]), | |
| queryClient.invalidateQueries([TEAM_DETAILS_QUERY_KEYS.teamList]), | |
| queryClient.invalidateQueries(['teamMenu']), | |
| ]); | |
| newToast({ | |
| message: `"${name}" Team has been deleted successfully.`, | |
| status: 'success', | |
| }); | |
| }) | |
| .catch((err: any) => { | |
| newToast({ | |
| message: | |
| err?.message ?? `Some error occurred while deleting ${name}.`, | |
| status: 'error', | |
| }); | |
| }) | |
| .finally(() => { | |
| setLoading(false); | |
| }); | |
| }; | |
| const handleDelete = async (name: string) => { | |
| setLoading(true); | |
| apiClient(`/v1/team/${localStorage.getItem('orgId')}/${name}`, { | |
| method: 'DELETE', | |
| headers: { | |
| Accept: 'application/json', | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| authorization: `bearer ${localStorage.getItem('token')}`, | |
| }, | |
| }) | |
| .then((res: any) => { | |
| await Promise.all([ | |
| queryClient.invalidateQueries([QUERY_KEYS.teams]), | |
| queryClient.invalidateQueries([TEAM_DETAILS_QUERY_KEYS.teamList]), | |
| queryClient.invalidateQueries(['teamMenu']), | |
| ]); | |
| newToast({ | |
| message: `"${name}" Team has been deleted successfully.`, | |
| status: 'success', | |
| }); | |
| }) | |
| .catch((err: any) => { | |
| newToast({ | |
| message: | |
| err?.message ?? `Some error occurred while deleting ${name}.`, | |
| status: 'error', | |
| }); | |
| }) | |
| .finally(() => { | |
| setLoading(false); | |
| }); | |
| }; |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In TeamTable.tsx around lines 283 to 315, the delete handler should be made
async and must validate token and orgId from localStorage before calling the
API; if either is missing, return early with an error toast and
setLoading(false). Replace the current promise chain with an async/await flow:
await the apiClient DELETE call inside try, then await Promise.all of the three
queryClient.invalidateQueries calls so invalidations/refetches finish before
showing the success toast; handle errors in catch (show error toast) and always
setLoading(false) in finally.
CodeAnt-AI Description
Add team table with hierarchy, counts, config status, and actions
What Changed
Impact
✅ Fewer accidental deletions of parent teams✅ Clearer member and manager counts✅ Faster access to edit teams and add members💡 Usage Guide
Checking Your Pull Request
Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.
Talking to CodeAnt AI
Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:
This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.
Example
Preserve Org Learnings with CodeAnt
You can record team preferences so CodeAnt AI applies them in future reviews. Reply directly to the specific CodeAnt AI suggestion (in the same thread) and replace "Your feedback here" with your input:
This helps CodeAnt AI learn and adapt to your team's coding style and standards.
Example
Retrigger review
Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:
Check Your Repository Health
To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes