Skip to content

Release new version: 7.11.0#494

Merged
Hmnt39 merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
chore/release
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

Release new version: 7.11.0#494
Hmnt39 merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
chore/release

Conversation

@Hmnt39
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Hmnt39 Hmnt39 commented Dec 1, 2025

This PR releases the new version 7.11.0 for python-extractor-utils.

@Hmnt39 Hmnt39 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 1, 2025 16:39
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello @Hmnt39, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request officially releases version 7.11.0 of the python-extractor-utils library. The primary functional change included in this release involves refactoring the configuration to remove extractor-specific settings from the base configuration, as documented in the updated changelog. This ensures a cleaner and more modular configuration structure for future development.

Highlights

  • Version Release: The python-extractor-utils package has been updated to version 7.11.0.
  • Configuration Refactoring: The CHANGELOG.md now includes an entry for version 7.11.0, detailing the removal of extractor-specific configuration from the base configuration.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request prepares for the 7.11.0 release by updating the version number in pyproject.toml and cognite/extractorutils/__init__.py, and adding a new entry to CHANGELOG.md. While the version bumps are correct, there appears to be a discrepancy between the code and the changelog. The changelog mentions the removal of extractor-specific configurations, but these configurations still seem to be present in the CogniteConfig class. This should be addressed to ensure the release notes are accurate.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.89%. Comparing base (a729400) to head (7334feb).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #494   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.89%   80.89%           
=======================================
  Files          43       43           
  Lines        4197     4197           
=======================================
  Hits         3395     3395           
  Misses        802      802           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
cognite/extractorutils/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated

### Changed

* Remove extractor specific config from the base config.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think here, its worth elaborating on which particular parameters we removed, because its a fair expectation that Extractor-Utils would be used by other developers so they would need to know what changes they would have to make from their previous implementation to the new implementation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should also be mentioned that this is the unstable module.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes done, mentioned for the unstable package

@Hmnt39 Hmnt39 requested review from einarmo and nithinb December 2, 2025 08:18
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@einarmo einarmo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🦄

@Hmnt39 Hmnt39 merged commit 0da864e into master Dec 2, 2025
6 checks passed
@Hmnt39 Hmnt39 deleted the chore/release branch December 2, 2025 08:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants