@@ -49,16 +49,16 @@ There are four options for getting Project approval:
49
49
* The Proposer will supply a form (modeled after [ this] ( https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6d/GLAM_partnership_evaluation_handout.pdf )
50
50
form by the Wikimedia Foundation) to explain the benefits and risks of the proposed contributions to the Project.
51
51
* The aims and form will be due 2 weeks before any Letter of Support (LOS) is needed and should be sent to the leadership team
52
- ( [ commonworkflowlanguage
\ @sfconservancy.org
] ( mailto:[email protected] ) ) .
52
+
53
53
A default LOS will be used unless otherwise requested by the Propser.
54
- * If no members of the Project leadership team nor the SFC object to the grant proposal, the proposal will be
55
- approved and the LOS will automatically be provided.
56
- * The members of the CWL Leadership team will keep information about grants that are not funded under a reasonable expectation of privacy
57
- * Note that a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) (e.g.
58
- < https://nonprofitdocuments.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/Collaboration-MOU-checklist-SLS-sample-07-05-17.pdf >
59
- between SFC and the Proposers will need to be developed and signed; plan accordingly.
60
- * If the Proposal is funded, it is required to publicly announce the funded grant on the CWL forum and link to the
61
- proposal (if it is possible to make publicly available)
54
+ * If no members of the Project leadership team nor the SFC object to the grant proposal, the proposal will be
55
+ approved and the LOS will automatically be provided.
56
+ * The members of the CWL Leadership team will keep information about grants that are not funded under a reasonable expectation of privacy
57
+ * Note that a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) (e.g.
58
+ < https://nonprofitdocuments.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/Collaboration-MOU-checklist-SLS-sample-07-05-17.pdf > )
59
+ between SFC and the Proposers will need to be developed and signed; plan accordingly.
60
+ * If the Proposal is funded, it is required to publicly announce the funded grant on the CWL forum and link to the
61
+ proposal (if it is possible to make publicly available)
62
62
63
63
For all these proposal options, Common Workflow Language should be cited
64
64
using the [ proper up-to-date citations] ( https://www.commonwl.org/specification/#references ) .
0 commit comments