Skip to content

Conversation

@anutosh491
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@anutosh491
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mcbarton and I are interested in this change.

We think it is specific to cppyy. To test it here's a PR that removes it from CppInterOp. We now check if the CppInterOp tests pass. If yes, we could then we can make a matching PR which adds the flags it to cppyy.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@anutosh491
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hey, I can confirm that this change is not required for now.
Probably the new flag should be removed down the line but we can keep it for now I guess.

Closing till we find a way to do this !

@anutosh491 anutosh491 closed this Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant