Skip to content

Conversation

@aaronj0
Copy link
Collaborator

@aaronj0 aaronj0 commented Dec 3, 2024

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2024

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2024

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2024

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2024

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.15%. Comparing base (74ad637) to head (a70fcc7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
lib/Interpreter/CppInterOp.cpp 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #367      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.31%   76.15%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines        3137     3137              
==========================================
- Hits         2394     2389       -5     
- Misses        743      748       +5     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/Interpreter/CppInterOp.cpp 79.80% <0.00%> (-0.28%) ⬇️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/Interpreter/CppInterOp.cpp 79.80% <0.00%> (-0.28%) ⬇️

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

@aaronj0 aaronj0 force-pushed the fix-assert branch 3 times, most recently from 6309657 to 12d45fc Compare December 3, 2024 21:42

#if !defined(NDEBUG) || !GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
// death tests don't work right on windows
#ifndef _WIN32
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought this was covered by GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST. Did anything in particular fail?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it doesn't hit the assertion:
1: Actual msg: 1: [ DEATH ] Unable to find target for this triple (no targets are registered)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we do #if !defined(NDEBUG) && !GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We do that, we do not need the _WIN32 thing...

Yes, it doesn't hit the assertion:
1: Actual msg: 1: [ DEATH ] Unable to find target for this triple (no targets are registered)

Seems a different problem...

Copy link
Contributor

@vgvassilev vgvassilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm!

@aaronj0 aaronj0 merged commit b90a9db into main Dec 6, 2024
42 of 44 checks passed
@vgvassilev vgvassilev deleted the fix-assert branch May 27, 2025 07:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants