Skip to content

Conversation

jackgisby
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Add RI as a conda dependency
  • Change methods for differences in RI's output
  • Remove tools/
  • Update tests for the changes

jackgisby added 30 commits May 30, 2020 17:59
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 14, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 94.86% // Head: 94.54% // Decreases project coverage by -0.32% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (8be406d) compared to base (88fd297).
Patch coverage: 93.89% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev      #18      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.86%   94.54%   -0.33%     
==========================================
  Files           7        8       +1     
  Lines         955     1191     +236     
==========================================
+ Hits          906     1126     +220     
- Misses         49       65      +16     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 94.54% <93.89%> (-0.33%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
metaboblend/databases/results.py 91.36% <91.36%> (ø)
metaboblend/build_structures/build.py 92.46% <92.46%> (ø)
metaboblend/build_structures/annotate.py 92.98% <92.98%> (ø)
metaboblend/databases/connectivity.py 96.06% <94.82%> (ø)
metaboblend/databases/substructures.py 95.53% <96.28%> (ø)
metaboblend/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
metaboblend/algorithms.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
metaboblend/parse.py 96.96% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@jackgisby jackgisby requested a review from RJMW August 8, 2022 13:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants