Skip to content

Conversation

@iparask
Copy link
Contributor

@iparask iparask commented Jan 29, 2026

Checklist

  • Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
  • License file is packaged (see here for an example).
  • Source is from official source.
  • Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
  • If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
  • Package does not ship static libraries. If static libraries are needed, follow CFEP-18.
  • Build number is 0.
  • A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
  • GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
  • When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

@iparask
Copy link
Contributor Author

iparask commented Jan 29, 2026

@arahlin can you confirm that you are willing to be a maintainer in this recipe?

@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

conda-forge-admin commented Jan 29, 2026

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/qpoint/meta.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/qpoint/meta.yaml:

  • noarch packages can't have skips with selectors. If the selectors are necessary, please remove noarch: python, or selector on line 13:
    skip: true # [py<39]

  • ❌ This recipe is using a compiler, which now requires adding a build dependence on {{ stdlib("c") }} as well. Note that this rule applies to each output of the recipe using a compiler.

For recipes/qpoint/meta.yaml:

  • ℹ️ Recipes should usually depend on astropy-base as opposed to astropy. astropy-base only has the required dependancies whereas astropy now has all optional dependancies as well.

This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/21492700080. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the staged-recipes linter and I found some lint.

File-specific lints and/or hints:

  • recipes/qpoint/meta.yaml:
    • lints:
      • The following maintainers have not yet confirmed that they are willing to be listed here: arahlin. Please ask them to comment on this PR if they are.

@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

conda-forge-admin commented Jan 29, 2026

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/qpoint/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/qpoint/meta.yaml:

  • ℹ️ noarch: python recipes should usually follow the syntax in our documentation for specifying the Python version.
    • For the host section of the recipe, you should usually use the pin python {{ python_min }} for the python entry.
    • For the run section of the recipe, you should usually use the pin python >={{ python_min }} for the python entry.
    • If the package requires a newer Python version than the currently supported minimum version on conda-forge, you can override the python_min variable by adding a Jinja2 set statement at the top of your recipe (or using an equivalent context variable for v1 recipes).

This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/21492972076. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.

@arahlin
Copy link

arahlin commented Jan 29, 2026

@arahlin can you confirm that you are willing to be a maintainer in this recipe?

Yes!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the staged-recipes linter and your PR looks excellent! 🚀

@iparask
Copy link
Contributor Author

iparask commented Jan 29, 2026

@conda-forge/help-python-c ready for review!

@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/qpoint/meta.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/qpoint/meta.yaml:

  • ❌ Non noarch packages should have python requirement without any version constraints.

This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/21493945892. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.

@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/qpoint/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants