WARNING: MAJOR (BREAKING) CHANGE: Update dependency urllib3 to v2 [SECURITY] (master) #1741
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For any questions/concerns about this PR, please review the Renovate Bot wiki/FAQs, or the #renovatebot Slack channel.
This PR contains the following updates:
==1.26.7->==2.5.0GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
CVE-2023-43804
urllib3 doesn't treat the
CookieHTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify aCookieheader and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly.Users must handle redirects themselves instead of relying on urllib3's automatic redirects to achieve safe processing of the
Cookieheader, thus we decided to strip the header by default in order to further protect users who aren't using the correct approach.Affected usages
We believe the number of usages affected by this advisory is low. It requires all of the following to be true to be exploited:
Cookieheader on requests, which is mostly typical for impersonating a browser.Remediation
redirects=Falsewhen sending requests.Cookieheader.CVE-2023-45803
urllib3 previously wouldn't remove the HTTP request body when an HTTP redirect response using status 303 "See Other" after the request had its method changed from one that could accept a request body (like
POST) toGETas is required by HTTP RFCs. Although the behavior of removing the request body is not specified in the section for redirects, it can be inferred by piecing together information from different sections and we have observed the behavior in other major HTTP client implementations like curl and web browsers.From RFC 9110 Section 9.3.1:
Affected usages
Because the vulnerability requires a previously trusted service to become compromised in order to have an impact on confidentiality we believe the exploitability of this vulnerability is low. Additionally, many users aren't putting sensitive data in HTTP request bodies, if this is the case then this vulnerability isn't exploitable.
Both of the following conditions must be true to be affected by this vulnerability:
Remediation
You can remediate this vulnerability with any of the following steps:
redirects=False.redirects=Falseand handle 303 redirects manually by stripping the HTTP request body.CVE-2024-37891
When using urllib3's proxy support with
ProxyManager, theProxy-Authorizationheader is only sent to the configured proxy, as expected.However, when sending HTTP requests without using urllib3's proxy support, it's possible to accidentally configure the
Proxy-Authorizationheader even though it won't have any effect as the request is not using a forwarding proxy or a tunneling proxy. In those cases, urllib3 doesn't treat theProxy-AuthorizationHTTP header as one carrying authentication material and thus doesn't strip the header on cross-origin redirects.Because this is a highly unlikely scenario, we believe the severity of this vulnerability is low for almost all users. Out of an abundance of caution urllib3 will automatically strip the
Proxy-Authorizationheader during cross-origin redirects to avoid the small chance that users are doing this on accident.Users should use urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to achieve safe processing of the
Proxy-Authorizationheader, but we still decided to strip the header by default in order to further protect users who aren't using the correct approach.Affected usages
We believe the number of usages affected by this advisory is low. It requires all of the following to be true to be exploited:
Proxy-Authorizationheader without using urllib3's built-in proxy support.Remediation
Proxy-Authorizationheader with urllib3'sProxyManager.redirects=Falsewhen sending requests.Proxy-Authorizationheader.CVE-2025-50181
urllib3 handles redirects and retries using the same mechanism, which is controlled by the
Retryobject. The most common way to disable redirects is at the request level, as follows:However, it is also possible to disable redirects, for all requests, by instantiating a
PoolManagerand specifyingretriesin a way that disable redirects:However, the
retriesparameter is currently ignored, which means all the above examples don't disable redirects.Affected usages
Passing
retriesonPoolManagerinstantiation to disable redirects or restrict their number.By default, requests and botocore users are not affected.
Impact
Redirects are often used to exploit SSRF vulnerabilities. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable.
Remediation
You can remediate this vulnerability with the following steps:
request()level instead of thePoolManager()level.CookieHTTP header isn't stripped on cross-origin redirectsCVE-2023-43804 / GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f / PYSEC-2023-192
More information
Details
urllib3 doesn't treat the
CookieHTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify aCookieheader and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly.Users must handle redirects themselves instead of relying on urllib3's automatic redirects to achieve safe processing of the
Cookieheader, thus we decided to strip the header by default in order to further protect users who aren't using the correct approach.Affected usages
We believe the number of usages affected by this advisory is low. It requires all of the following to be true to be exploited:
Cookieheader on requests, which is mostly typical for impersonating a browser.Remediation
redirects=Falsewhen sending requests.Cookieheader.Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:NReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
CVE-2023-43804 / GHSA-v845-jxx5-vc9f / PYSEC-2023-192
More information
Details
urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. urllib3 doesn't treat the
CookieHTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify aCookieheader and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. This issue has been patched in urllib3 version 1.26.17 or 2.0.5.Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:NReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the PyPI Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
CVE-2023-45803 / GHSA-g4mx-q9vg-27p4 / PYSEC-2023-212
More information
Details
urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. urllib3 previously wouldn't remove the HTTP request body when an HTTP redirect response using status 301, 302, or 303 after the request had its method changed from one that could accept a request body (like
POST) toGETas is required by HTTP RFCs. Although this behavior is not specified in the section for redirects, it can be inferred by piecing together information from different sections and we have observed the behavior in other major HTTP client implementations like curl and web browsers. Because the vulnerability requires a previously trusted service to become compromised in order to have an impact on confidentiality we believe the exploitability of this vulnerability is low. Additionally, many users aren't putting sensitive data in HTTP request bodies, if this is the case then this vulnerability isn't exploitable. Both of the following conditions must be true to be affected by this vulnerability: 1. Using urllib3 and submitting sensitive information in the HTTP request body (such as form data or JSON) and 2. The origin service is compromised and starts redirecting using 301, 302, or 303 to a malicious peer or the redirected-to service becomes compromised. This issue has been addressed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7 and users are advised to update to resolve this issue. Users unable to update should disable redirects for services that aren't expecting to respond with redirects withredirects=Falseand disable automatic redirects withredirects=Falseand handle 301, 302, and 303 redirects manually by stripping the HTTP request body.Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the PyPI Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
urllib3's request body not stripped after redirect from 303 status changes request method to GET
CVE-2023-45803 / GHSA-g4mx-q9vg-27p4 / PYSEC-2023-212
More information
Details
urllib3 previously wouldn't remove the HTTP request body when an HTTP redirect response using status 303 "See Other" after the request had its method changed from one that could accept a request body (like
POST) toGETas is required by HTTP RFCs. Although the behavior of removing the request body is not specified in the section for redirects, it can be inferred by piecing together information from different sections and we have observed the behavior in other major HTTP client implementations like curl and web browsers.From RFC 9110 Section 9.3.1:
Affected usages
Because the vulnerability requires a previously trusted service to become compromised in order to have an impact on confidentiality we believe the exploitability of this vulnerability is low. Additionally, many users aren't putting sensitive data in HTTP request bodies, if this is the case then this vulnerability isn't exploitable.
Both of the following conditions must be true to be affected by this vulnerability:
Remediation
You can remediate this vulnerability with any of the following steps:
redirects=False.redirects=Falseand handle 303 redirects manually by stripping the HTTP request body.Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
urllib3's Proxy-Authorization request header isn't stripped during cross-origin redirects
CVE-2024-37891 / GHSA-34jh-p97f-mpxf
More information
Details
When using urllib3's proxy support with
ProxyManager, theProxy-Authorizationheader is only sent to the configured proxy, as expected.However, when sending HTTP requests without using urllib3's proxy support, it's possible to accidentally configure the
Proxy-Authorizationheader even though it won't have any effect as the request is not using a forwarding proxy or a tunneling proxy. In those cases, urllib3 doesn't treat theProxy-AuthorizationHTTP header as one carrying authentication material and thus doesn't strip the header on cross-origin redirects.Because this is a highly unlikely scenario, we believe the severity of this vulnerability is low for almost all users. Out of an abundance of caution urllib3 will automatically strip the
Proxy-Authorizationheader during cross-origin redirects to avoid the small chance that users are doing this on accident.Users should use urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to achieve safe processing of the
Proxy-Authorizationheader, but we still decided to strip the header by default in order to further protect users who aren't using the correct approach.Affected usages
We believe the number of usages affected by this advisory is low. It requires all of the following to be true to be exploited:
Proxy-Authorizationheader without using urllib3's built-in proxy support.Remediation
Proxy-Authorizationheader with urllib3'sProxyManager.redirects=Falsewhen sending requests.Proxy-Authorizationheader.Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
urllib3 redirects are not disabled when retries are disabled on PoolManager instantiation
CVE-2025-50181 / GHSA-pq67-6m6q-mj2v
More information
Details
urllib3 handles redirects and retries using the same mechanism, which is controlled by the
Retryobject. The most common way to disable redirects is at the request level, as follows:However, it is also possible to disable redirects, for all requests, by instantiating a
PoolManagerand specifyingretriesin a way that disable redirects:However, the
retriesparameter is currently ignored, which means all the above examples don't disable redirects.Affected usages
Passing
retriesonPoolManagerinstantiation to disable redirects or restrict their number.By default, requests and botocore users are not affected.
Impact
Redirects are often used to exploit SSRF vulnerabilities. An application attempting to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities by disabling redirects at the PoolManager level will remain vulnerable.
Remediation
You can remediate this vulnerability with the following steps:
request()level instead of thePoolManager()level.Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.