Add linting to docker bake for local validation

[austinvazquez]

Adds golangci-lint to the Docker bake for local validation.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds linting capabilities to the Docker bake configuration for local validation. It introduces a comprehensive linting setup that includes golangci-lint, yamllint, and Dockerfile validation to improve code quality and consistency.

• Adds a new "validate" group to docker-bake.hcl with lint and validate-dockerfile targets
• Updates the CI workflow to use Docker-based linting instead of golangci-lint-action
• Introduces yamllint configuration for YAML file validation

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
docker-bake.hcl	Adds validate group with lint and validate-dockerfile targets, including matrix builds for different linting tools
Makefile	Adds validate and lint targets that invoke Docker bake commands
Dockerfile	Implements multi-stage build for golangci-lint, yamllint, and related linting infrastructure
.yamllint.yml	Configuration file for yamllint with custom rules and exclusions
.github/workflows/ci.yml	Simplifies CI by replacing golangci-lint-action with Docker-based validation

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[austinvazquez]

A little opinionated but as a bonus I threw in YAML and Dockerfile validation. I'd like to get the protobuf validation and generation next because I am bad at install all the tools locally myself. 😅

[austinvazquez]

Needs #37 for project checks

[dmcgowan]

Protobuf would be very useful for sure, we could use that in containerd as well since it is a bit of a pain.

New approach looks good, just rebase and can get this one in next