-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
Butane merge #631
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
vic1707
wants to merge
10
commits into
coreos:main
Choose a base branch
from
vic1707:butane-merge
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+507
−350
Open
Butane merge #631
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
882b4fa
Add new `local_butane` and `inline_butane` props
vic1707 df0f56e
move global translate function to avoid cycle imports
vic1707 7829756
extract ignition treatment
vic1707 299819b
handle both new merge cases
vic1707 b2c41ca
add the missing line, still cycle imports
vic1707 4021d10
solution for the import cycle
vic1707 56b588a
simplify TranslateResource
vic1707 c8dbe65
edit release notes
vic1707 ef1a297
missing validation logic for `inline_butane`
vic1707 1c19030
dedup translateButaneRessource
vic1707 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, this feels odd; probably coming from the fact that the new fields are in "resource". (noting for self need to check about this)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe I can divide the Resource type?
One for "classic" ressources, another one for merged configs?