Skip to content

Blog: Query Rejection #6944

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2025
Merged

Conversation

erlan-z
Copy link
Contributor

@erlan-z erlan-z commented Aug 5, 2025

What this PR does:
There has been some talk about creating a blog in Cortex.
#6471

This is blog post for query rejection feature.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Checklist

  • Tests updated
  • Documentation added
  • CHANGELOG.md updated - the order of entries should be [CHANGE], [FEATURE], [ENHANCEMENT], [BUGFIX]

Signed-off-by: Erlan Zholdubai uulu <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@CharlieTLe CharlieTLe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Aug 5, 2025
Copy link
Member

@friedrichg friedrichg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this

@friedrichg friedrichg merged commit a7592b6 into cortexproject:master Aug 5, 2025
30 of 32 checks passed
aclaygray pushed a commit to aclaygray/cortex that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
Signed-off-by: Erlan Zholdubai uulu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gray <[email protected]>
@yeya24
Copy link
Contributor

yeya24 commented Aug 8, 2025

I am a bit late. But should we consider adding rule group rejection here as well?

@erlan-z
Copy link
Contributor Author

erlan-z commented Aug 8, 2025

But should we consider adding rule group rejection here as well?

Yes, makes sense. Created PR with rule group rejection added and some other small fixes: #6949

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/documentation lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size/L
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants