Skip to content

[4.0.0 backport] modify revs_limit API docs#7809

Merged
torcolvin merged 1 commit intorelease/4.0.0from
backport-openapi-4.0.0
Oct 8, 2025
Merged

[4.0.0 backport] modify revs_limit API docs#7809
torcolvin merged 1 commit intorelease/4.0.0from
backport-openapi-4.0.0

Conversation

@torcolvin
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a doc only fix that allows tagging of 4.0-docs more easily.

@torcolvin torcolvin requested a review from gregns1 October 8, 2025 16:15
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 8, 2025 16:15
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Redocly previews

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request updates legacy configuration examples and API documentation by removing deprecated parameters and fixing documentation text. It's a documentation-only change to facilitate easier tagging of 4.0-docs.

  • Removes allow_conflicts and revs_limit parameters from legacy configuration examples
  • Updates num_index_replicas to use the new nested index.num_replicas structure
  • Corrects grammar in the revs_limit API documentation
  • Updates server URLs from HTTP to Couchbase protocol format

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 26 out of 26 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
examples/legacy_config/*.json Removal of deprecated allow_conflicts and revs_limit parameters from various legacy configuration examples
examples/database_config/*.json Updates to use new index.num_replicas structure instead of num_index_replicas
docs/api/components/schemas.yaml Grammar correction in revs_limit description and removal of outdated minimum value information

@torcolvin torcolvin merged commit 4e97342 into release/4.0.0 Oct 8, 2025
28 checks passed
@torcolvin torcolvin deleted the backport-openapi-4.0.0 branch October 8, 2025 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants