fix: Add authorization check for knowledge_delete node#1865
Merged
lvxinyu-1117 merged 1 commit intomainfrom Aug 29, 2025
Merged
fix: Add authorization check for knowledge_delete node#1865lvxinyu-1117 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
lvxinyu-1117 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
zhuangjie1125
approved these changes
Aug 29, 2025
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
... and 1873 files with indirect coverage changes 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
futeng
pushed a commit
to futeng/coze-studio
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
Check the PR title.
(Optional) Translate the PR title into Chinese.
(Optional) More detailed description for this PR(en: English/zh: Chinese).
en: Add authorization check for knowledge_delete node
zh(optional): 知识库删除节点增加文档是否属于所选知识库的鉴权校验
(Optional) Which issue(s) this PR fixes: