Add note that this issue should also attempt to restore or define the equivalent of the term "constant initializer".

Author: Dani-Hub

xml/issue2833.xml

@@ -166,11 +166,19 @@ actually say how it does what it does, so it's not possible for a reader to
 know whether they can expect it to be usable in a constant expression.
 </note>
 
+<note>2025-08-22; Discussion of editorial issue #4954</note>
+<p>
+During the discussion of <a href="https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/issues/4954">editorial issue #4954</a>
+it has been suggested that this issue here should also attempt to find a replacement for the 
+definition of the term "constant initializer" which got lost by 
+<a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2366">CWG 2366</a> but is still referenced by <sref ref="[istream.iterator.cons]"/> p3.
+</p>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>
 <p>
-This wording is relative to <a href="https://wg21.link/n4861">N4861</a>.
+This wording is relative to <paper num="N4861"/>.
 </p>
 
 <ol>