Skip to content

Updated comment on issue 4484 #531

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
jwakely merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2025
Merged

Updated comment on issue 4484 #531

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion xml/issue4484.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,7 +19,9 @@ but per <sref ref="[temp.param]"/>/13, a template parameter object must be of a

<note>2025-11-27; Tomasz comments</note>
<p>
This was on core side by LWG <iref ref="4437"/>. The usage of the term template parameter object is intended (uniqueness).
The template argument object defintion was extended to cover objects of array types by CWG 3111.
The usage of the term "template parameter object" is intentional here, as it guarantees that
`reflect_constant_string` produces the same objects, where their content is the same.
</p>
</discussion>

Expand Down