Skip to content

Conversation

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the post-2024-11 milestone Nov 24, 2024
@jensmaurer jensmaurer force-pushed the motions-2024-11-cwg-5 branch from 318bc0e to 57948ec Compare November 24, 2024 21:33
@xmcgcg
Copy link
Contributor

xmcgcg commented Nov 27, 2024

[inplace.vector.overview] p6 says:

Let IV denote a specialization of inplace_vector<T, N>. If N is zero, then IV is both trivial and empty.

The “trivial” here also needs to be replaced.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2024-11-cwg-5 branch from 57948ec to a2d0ec7 Compare December 16, 2024 01:40
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Dec 16, 2024

@jensmaurer Could you please send a PR for after motions where we address the N=0 case as per the above comment? I think it's fine as editorial, but should be a separate commit.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 9eb37be into main Dec 16, 2024
4 checks passed
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the motions-2024-11-cwg-5 branch February 15, 2025 22:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[2024-11 CWG Motion 5] P3247R2 Deprecate the notion of trivial types P3247 R2 Deprecate the notion of trivial types

4 participants