Skip to content

[expected.bad.void] Editorial fix - syntax error in bad_expected_access<void> #7529

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
jensmaurer merged 1 commit into from
Jan 1, 2025
Merged

[expected.bad.void] Editorial fix - syntax error in bad_expected_access<void> #7529

jensmaurer merged 1 commit into from
Jan 1, 2025

Conversation

@Bronek
Copy link
Member

@Bronek Bronek commented Jan 1, 2025

This fixes obviously invalid syntax in the definition of bad_expected_access<void> class specialization

bad_expected_access& operator=(const bad_expected_access& noexcept);

jwakely
jwakely approved these changes Jan 1, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was introduced by 8c99744 in #6915

@jensmaurer jensmaurer closed this Jan 1, 2025
@jensmaurer jensmaurer reopened this Jan 1, 2025
@jensmaurer jensmaurer merged commit 1411cf5 into cplusplus:main Jan 1, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jwakely jwakely jwakely approved these changes

@jensmaurer jensmaurer jensmaurer approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Bronek @jwakely @jensmaurer