Skip to content

Conversation

@eisenwave
Copy link
Member

@eisenwave eisenwave commented Feb 11, 2025

This change is motivated in part by P3421R1 discussion in CWG at Hagenberg.

If accepted, "constexpr destructor" and "constexpr destructor" no longer mean the same, and referencing the formal term may be helpful.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer merged commit ddb98da into cplusplus:main Mar 30, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants