Skip to content

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Fixes NB US 231-361 (C++26 CD).

Fixes cplusplus/nbballot#936

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot label Oct 5, 2025
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

@jwakely , having exposition-only data members and an exposition-only enumeration might be the better outcome here, but that leaves the atomic nature of count and state a bit out in the rain.

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Oct 5, 2025

It seems a little unnatural to refer to "count" and "state" this way, when they aren't actual variables. We could rephrase p2 in terms of having a counter, and then refer to "the counter" and "the associated state" rather than just "count" and "state". And maybe capitalise the state names, Starting etc.

But I don't feel strongly about that suggestion.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the C++26 milestone Oct 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

US 231-361 33.12.1.3 [exec.run.loop.ctor] Fix font for non-code words
2 participants