Skip to content

Conversation

hewillk
Copy link
Contributor

@hewillk hewillk commented Oct 7, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't do this elsewhere for exposition-only helpers, do we?

e.g. [container.intro.reqmts] and [sequences.general] and [associative.general].

Is there any possible confusion about what this exposition-only concept means? Is it relevant which namespace it's a member of, given that users can never refer to it?

@hewillk
Copy link
Contributor Author

hewillk commented Oct 7, 2025

Maybe. But this is only to consistent with [expos.only.entity] which also belongs to [library].

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants