-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 802
P3923R0 Additional NB comment resolutions for Kona 2025 #8536
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Fixes NB AT 7-213 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 140-233 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 141-235 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 145-234 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 147-240 (C++26 CD).
f7ba14c to
d402a70
Compare
Fixes NB US 164-263 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 126-189 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 227-346 and US 229-347 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 221-339 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 225-341 (C++26 CD).
d402a70 to
3aebb04
Compare
| void @\exposid{destroy}@() noexcept; // \expos | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| template<class Alloc, @\libconcept{scope_token}@ Token, @\libconcept{sender}@ Sender, class Env> // \expos |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need the \expos comment here? It's not in the paper.
Where is this deduction guide used, only in the spec, or is its existence observable to users?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it may get used somehow by spawn_future; https://eel.is/c++draft/exec#spawn.future-17
Anyhow, it felt intuitively necessary, but I'm really not sure whether it actually is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've raised it on mattermost
jwakely
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Non-urgent whitespace changes, and a question about an \expos marker.
jwakely
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
We need a decision about the \expos on the spawn-future-state deduction guide, but that doesn't need to block merging this.
Fixes #8478
Fixes NB AT 7-213 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 140-233 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 141-235 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 145-234 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 147-240 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 164-263 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 126-189 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 227-346 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 229-347 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 221-339 (C++26 CD).
Fixes NB US 225-341 (C++26 CD).
Also fixes https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/782
Also fixes https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/804
Also fixes https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/806
Also fixes https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/805
Also fixes https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/811
Also fixes https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/838
Also fixes https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/758
Also fixes https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/921
Also fixes https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/922
Also fixes https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/914
Also fixes https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/916