Skip to content

Fix typo #393

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2025
Merged

Fix typo #393

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion not-so-smart-contracts/ton/forward_ton_without_gas_check/README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

TON smart contracts needs to send TON as gas fee along with the Jetton transfers or any other message they send to another contract. If a contract allows its users to specify the amount of TON to be sent with an outgoing message then it must check that the user supplied enough TON with their message to cover for the transaction fee and the forward TON amount.

If a contract lacks such a gas check then users can specify a higher forward TON amount to drain the TON balance of the smart contract, freezing the smart contract and potentially destrying it.
If a contract lacks such a gas check then users can specify a higher forward TON amount to drain the TON balance of the smart contract, freezing the smart contract and potentially destroying it.

## Example

Expand Down
Loading