Skip to content

Conversation

@waralexrom
Copy link
Member

Check List

  • Tests have been run in packages where changes made if available
  • Linter has been run for changed code
  • Tests for the changes have been added if not covered yet
  • Docs have been added / updated if required

Issue Reference this PR resolves

[For example #12]

Description of Changes Made (if issue reference is not provided)

[Description goes here]

@waralexrom waralexrom requested a review from a team as a code owner April 2, 2025 20:19
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.57%. Comparing base (14ae6a4) to head (35b11fe).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9418   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.57%   76.57%           
=======================================
  Files         400      400           
  Lines      105044   105044           
  Branches     3707     3707           
=======================================
  Hits        80434    80434           
  Misses      24174    24174           
  Partials      436      436           
Flag Coverage Δ
cube-backend 47.86% <ø> (ø)
cubesql 83.91% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@waralexrom waralexrom requested a review from KSDaemon April 8, 2025 14:22
Copy link
Member

@KSDaemon KSDaemon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool! 👍🏻

Base automatically changed from tesseract-fix-member-expressions-issues to master April 8, 2025 15:38
@waralexrom waralexrom force-pushed the tesseract-refactor-of-time-shifts branch from c7e6ab1 to 096e098 Compare April 8, 2025 16:20
@waralexrom waralexrom merged commit 8e9c90d into master Apr 8, 2025
78 checks passed
@waralexrom waralexrom deleted the tesseract-refactor-of-time-shifts branch April 8, 2025 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants