Skip to content

Conversation

@waralexrom
Copy link
Member

Check List

  • Tests have been run in packages where changes made if available
  • Linter has been run for changed code
  • Tests for the changes have been added if not covered yet
  • Docs have been added / updated if required

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.23%. Comparing base (4697600) to head (37e2479).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9497       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   58.47%   80.23%   +21.76%     
===========================================
  Files         169      399      +230     
  Lines       13990    97815    +83825     
  Branches     2275     2275               
===========================================
+ Hits         8180    78485    +70305     
- Misses       5495    19015    +13520     
  Partials      315      315               
Flag Coverage Δ
cube-backend 58.47% <ø> (ø)
cubesql 83.87% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@waralexrom waralexrom requested a review from KSDaemon April 22, 2025 08:22
Copy link
Member

@KSDaemon KSDaemon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏻 🥇 This is great!
Left some typos...

}

#[derive(Clone)]
pub enum LogicalJoinItem {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are any new variants expected or planned here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, PreAggregationSource for example.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, pre aggregation for example

}
};

let time_seira = TimeSeries::new(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
let time_seira = TimeSeries::new(
let time_series = TimeSeries::new(

let mut render_references = HashMap::new();
let mut select_builder = SelectBuilder::new(from.clone());

//We insert render reference for main time dimension (with the some granularity as in time series to avoid unnessesary date_tranc)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
//We insert render reference for main time dimension (with the some granularity as in time series to avoid unnessesary date_tranc)
//We insert rendered reference for the main time dimension (with the same granularity as in time series to avoid unnecessary date_tranc)

QualifiedColumnName::new(Some(root_alias.clone()), format!("date_from")),
);

//We also insert render reference for the base dimension of time dimension (i.e. without `_granularity` prefix to let other time dimensions make date_tranc)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
//We also insert render reference for the base dimension of time dimension (i.e. without `_granularity` prefix to let other time dimensions make date_tranc)
//We also insert rendered reference for the base dimension of the time dimension (i.e. without `_granularity` prefix to let other time dimensions make date_tranc)

@waralexrom waralexrom force-pushed the tesseract-logical-plan branch from 2d7ac7e to 37e2479 Compare April 28, 2025 08:37
@waralexrom waralexrom merged commit 4098c28 into master Apr 28, 2025
56 checks passed
@waralexrom waralexrom deleted the tesseract-logical-plan branch April 28, 2025 09:33
marianore-muttdata pushed a commit to MuttData/cube that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants