Skip to content

Add efficiency report and optimize coordinate reversal in WalkAlong#1

Merged
danfma merged 1 commit intomainfrom
devin/1759754812-efficiency-improvements
Oct 6, 2025
Merged

Add efficiency report and optimize coordinate reversal in WalkAlong#1
danfma merged 1 commit intomainfrom
devin/1759754812-efficiency-improvements

Conversation

@danfma
Copy link
Owner

@danfma danfma commented Oct 6, 2025

Add efficiency report and optimize coordinate reversal in WalkAlong

Summary

This PR adds a comprehensive efficiency analysis report documenting 10+ performance optimization opportunities across the DotTerritory codebase, and implements one specific optimization to demonstrate the approach.

Key changes:

  • New file: EFFICIENCY_REPORT.md - comprehensive analysis of allocation and LINQ-related performance bottlenecks
  • Code fix: Optimized Territory.WalkAlong() method to replace Reverse().ToArray() with more efficient Array.Reverse() approach

The optimization eliminates an unnecessary intermediate IEnumerable<Coordinate> allocation when walking along a line with negative distance, reducing GC pressure in a hot path operation.

Review & Testing Checklist for Human

⚠️ IMPORTANT: This change was not tested locally due to missing .NET SDK in dev environment

  • Run tests and verify behavior - Especially WalkAlongTest.WalkAlong_NegativeDistance which directly exercises the modified code path
  • Verify behavioral equivalence - Confirm that Array.Reverse(coords.ToArray()) produces identical results to coords.Reverse().ToArray() for edge cases (empty arrays, single coordinates, etc.)
  • Review efficiency report accuracy - Spot-check a few of the identified issues in the report to validate the analysis is sound

Recommended Test Plan

  1. Run full test suite: dotnet test src/DotTerritory.sln
  2. Specifically verify these WalkAlong test scenarios pass:
    • WalkAlong_NegativeDistance (exercises the fixed code)
    • WalkAlong_Loop and WalkAlong_OneAndHalfLoop (verify no regressions)
  3. Consider running a quick benchmark on WalkAlong with negative distances to validate the performance claim

Notes

- Add comprehensive efficiency report documenting 10+ optimization opportunities
- Fix Reverse().ToArray() inefficiency in WalkAlong method
- Replace with more efficient Array.Reverse() approach
- Eliminates unnecessary intermediate enumerable allocation

Co-Authored-By: Daniel Ferreira Monteiro Alves <danfma@gmail.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 6, 2025 12:48
@devin-ai-integration
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

  • Address comments on this PR. Add '(aside)' to your comment to have me ignore it.
  • Look at CI failures and help fix them

Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository.

⚙️ Control Options:

  • Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a comprehensive performance analysis document and implements an optimization to reduce memory allocations in the Territory.WalkAlong() method.

  • Adds EFFICIENCY_REPORT.md documenting 10 performance optimization opportunities across the codebase
  • Optimizes coordinate reversal in WalkAlong() to eliminate intermediate IEnumerable<Coordinate> allocation
  • Replaces Reverse().ToArray() pattern with more efficient Array.Reverse() approach

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
src/DotTerritory/Territory.Along.cs Optimizes coordinate reversal by using in-place Array.Reverse() instead of LINQ operations
EFFICIENCY_REPORT.md Comprehensive analysis documenting allocation bottlenecks and performance optimization opportunities

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.


---

**Report Generated:** October 6, 2025
Copy link

Copilot AI Oct 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Date appears to be incorrect - report shows October 6, 2025 but current date should be in 2024 or early 2025.

Suggested change
**Report Generated:** October 6, 2025
**Report Generated:** June 6, 2024

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@danfma danfma merged commit 8ef4192 into main Oct 6, 2025
1 check passed
@danfma danfma deleted the devin/1759754812-efficiency-improvements branch October 6, 2025 13:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant