Skip to content

Conversation

@kjacque
Copy link
Contributor

@kjacque kjacque commented Jan 6, 2026

Suppress a valgrind false positive for Go runtime function ShadowSet.

Steps for the author:

  • Commit message follows the guidelines.
  • Appropriate Features or Test-tag pragmas were used.
  • Appropriate Functional Test Stages were run.
  • At least two positive code reviews including at least one code owner from each category referenced in the PR.
  • Testing is complete. If necessary, forced-landing label added and a reason added in a comment.

After all prior steps are complete:

  • Gatekeeper requested (daos-gatekeeper added as a reviewer).

Suppress a valgrind false positive for Go runtime function
ShadowSet.

Signed-off-by: Kris Jacque <[email protected]>
@kjacque kjacque requested review from a team January 6, 2026 23:48
@kjacque kjacque self-assigned this Jan 6, 2026
@kjacque kjacque requested review from a team as code owners January 6, 2026 23:48
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2026

Ticket title is 'NLT valgrind - uninitialized value in function ShadowSet'
Status is 'In Review'
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-18343

@daosbuild3
Copy link
Collaborator

@kjacque
Copy link
Contributor Author

kjacque commented Jan 7, 2026

The NLT valgrind issue run into above is DAOS-17416.

@kjacque kjacque requested review from knard38 and mjmac January 8, 2026 21:31
@kjacque kjacque added the forced-landing The PR has known failures or has intentionally reduced testing, but should still be landed. label Jan 9, 2026
@kjacque kjacque requested a review from a team January 9, 2026 16:57
@daltonbohning daltonbohning merged commit ac24ca6 into master Jan 9, 2026
45 of 48 checks passed
@daltonbohning daltonbohning deleted the kjacque/nlt-valgrind-shadowset branch January 9, 2026 17:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

forced-landing The PR has known failures or has intentionally reduced testing, but should still be landed.

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants