Update actor state store docs to include strong consistency requirement

[jjcollinge]

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Collinge [email protected]

Thank you for helping make the Dapr documentation better!

Please follow this checklist before submitting:

• Commits are signed with Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO - learn more)
• Read the contribution guide
• Commands include options for Linux, MacOS, and Windows within codetabs
• New file and folder names are globally unique
• Page references use shortcodes instead of markdown or URL links
• Images use HTML style and have alternative text
• Places where multiple code/command options are given have codetabs

In addition, please fill out the following to help reviewers understand this pull request:

Description

Updates the state store documentation for actor state stores to make it clear that it must be setup with strong consistency as outlined in the state store design reference https://github.com/dapr/dapr/blob/master/docs/decision_records/api/API-005-state-store-behavior.md. Its possible that people are using state stores that are "actor compatible" but with a weaker consistency model which can cause undefined behaviour.

Issue reference

[msfussell]

LGTM

[jjcollinge]

@yaron2 shall I close this or ok to merge?

[yaron2]

Technically we don't require the state store to be strongly consistent, meaning Dapr will not error or issue a warning if a non consistent store is chose. That's because the runtime code doesn't make explicit use of the consistency settings when using the State API interface from contrib. That said it should be recommended that users choosing a multi-replica database set it to strong consistency from the database side, so I'm happy if the PR is changed to reflect that

[marcduiker]

LGTM