Skip to content

Conversation

WhitWaldo
Copy link

On the maintainers' call on 3/24/25, @JoshVanL proposed an idea he'd been thinking about regarding resuscitating workflows that were in a terminal state and shared some background around the origins of the idea. While thinking about what this might look like, it occurred to me that there was potentially a simpler approach that accommodated the same conclusion, but which might fit better in the existing Dapr Workflows paradigm, so I've typed this up to get broader feedback.

@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo self-assigned this Mar 25, 2025
@olitomlinson
Copy link

olitomlinson commented Mar 25, 2025

I strongly recommend that you sync up with @cgillum as he has extremely valuable prior art here with the Rewind API in Azure Durable Functions, which never made it to GA because of challenges.

Personally, I would like to see this solved at the DurableTask level and I would also like to see the proposal considered along side versioning and patching (similar to Temporals approach) to see which has the most immediate and impactful value to customers / bang-for-engineering-buck

@jjcollinge
Copy link

I strongly recommend that you sync up with @cgillum as he has extremely valuable prior art here with the Rewind API in Azure Durable Functions, which never made it to GA because of challenges.

Personally, I would like to see this solved at the DurableTask level and I would also like to see the proposal considered along side versioning and patching (similar to Temporals approach) to see which has the most immediate and impactful value to customers / bang-for-engineering-buck

Linking Azure/azure-functions-durable-extension#1828

@WhitWaldo
Copy link
Author

As we're moving forward with #80 instead, I submit that this proposal is no longer necessary.

@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo closed this Jun 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants