Skip to content

Conversation

@Bisaloo
Copy link
Member

@Bisaloo Bisaloo commented Aug 22, 2025

As recommended in carpentries/sandpaper-docs#241.

This also serves as a test for ropenscilabs/aeolus#12 (cc @maelle).

There were a couple of minor unexpected changes (fixed in 2fbc3ad) for which I'll try to open issues in aeolus after creating appropriate reprexes. The main issue, which is not exactly aeolus' fault, was that "data.frame" resulted in a bunch of spurious linebreaks.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 22, 2025

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

  • 🎯 correct output
  • 🖼️ correct figures
  • ❓ new warnings
  • ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/datacarpentry/R-ecology-lesson/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-933

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 config.yaml (new)                                  |   86 +
 ...isualizing-ggplot-rendered-boxplot-jitter-1.png |  Bin 406389 -> 405742 bytes
 ...ualizing-ggplot-rendered-boxplot-outliers-1.png |  Bin 405225 -> 403704 bytes
 ...lot-rendered-customizing-challenge-answer-1.png |  Bin 775347 -> 779035 bytes
 ...visualizing-ggplot-rendered-element-blank-1.png |  Bin 652750 -> 651691 bytes
 fig/visualizing-ggplot-rendered-facet-wrap-1.png   |  Bin 557385 -> 553843 bytes
 fig/visualizing-ggplot-rendered-fill-na-1.png      |  Bin 630597 -> 632602 bytes
 fig/visualizing-ggplot-rendered-geom-color-1.png   |  Bin 655125 -> 651082 bytes
 fig/visualizing-ggplot-rendered-global-color-1.png |  Bin 646551 -> 649381 bytes
 fig/visualizing-ggplot-rendered-labels-1.png       |  Bin 795753 -> 794701 bytes
 ...visualizing-ggplot-rendered-legend-remove-1.png |  Bin 812343 -> 813893 bytes
 ...isualizing-ggplot-rendered-reverse-layers-1.png |  Bin 499303 -> 503953 bytes
 fig/visualizing-ggplot-rendered-text-size-1.png    |  Bin 652676 -> 654256 bytes
 fig/visualizing-ggplot-rendered-theme-bw-1.png     |  Bin 652716 -> 652063 bytes
 ...sualizing-ggplot-rendered-unnamed-chunk-1-1.png |  Bin 634693 -> 635380 bytes
 ...g-ggplot-rendered-violin-challenge-answer-1.png |  Bin 568667 -> 567458 bytes
 ...ggplot-rendered-violin-challenge-answer-2-1.png |  Bin 571594 -> 569110 bytes
 ...-data-rendered-date-plot-challenge-answer-1.png |  Bin 453296 -> 454455 bytes
 how-r-thinks-about-data.md                         |  198 +-
 instructor-notes.md                                |  239 +-
 introduction-r-rstudio.md                          |  160 +-
 md5sum.txt                                         |   14 +-
 reference.md                                       |    2 -
 renv.lock (new)                                    | 4151 ++++++++++++++++++++
 setup.md                                           |  114 +-
 visualizing-ggplot.md                              |  272 +-
 working-with-data.md                               |  282 +-
 27 files changed, 5034 insertions(+), 484 deletions(-)
What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2025-09-06 07:36:45 +0000

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2025
@Bisaloo
Copy link
Member Author

Bisaloo commented Aug 22, 2025

Reverting to draft as this needs to also be applied to non-episode files.

@Bisaloo Bisaloo marked this pull request as draft August 22, 2025 14:35
@Bisaloo Bisaloo force-pushed the sentence-linebreaks branch from 2fbc3ad to 27e47a8 Compare August 24, 2025 15:34
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2025
@Bisaloo Bisaloo marked this pull request as ready for review August 24, 2025 16:03
@Bisaloo Bisaloo requested a review from a team August 24, 2025 16:03
Copy link
Contributor

@CarolynKoehn CarolynKoehn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested changes are mostly bad line breaks. There are also some grammar fixes.

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants