uses consistent carpentries terminology

[sstevens2]

for episode and lesson

[github-actions]

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

• 🎯 correct output
• 🖼️ correct figures
• ❓ new warnings
• ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/datacarpentry/r-raster-vector-geospatial/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-475

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 05-raster-multi-band-in-r.md | 2 +-
 md5sum.txt                   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2025-06-03 15:51:20 +0000

[jonjab]

Yikes! @sstevens2 something went wrong with this one. Had to revert.

I'm as surprised as you probably are. It was a very simple PR

[sstevens2]

That is weird. Though looking at my change again, I don't think it is needed. It is an earlier episode but also an earlier lesson (the data organization lesson).