BEA_USStatesQuarterlyGDP fixed statType error

[HarishC727]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @HarishC727, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a data modeling inconsistency by ensuring that all relevant statistical variables for BEA US States Quarterly GDP data explicitly define their statType as dcid:measuredValue. This change improves the accuracy and completeness of the data schema. Additionally, it includes minor refinements such as standardizing a generated filename's casing and correcting NAICS code formatting, along with the introduction of a new statistical variable.

Highlights

• StatType Correction: The statType: dcid:measuredValue property has been added to numerous statistical variable definitions across states_gdp_industry_statvars.mcf and states_gdp_statvars.mcf to ensure data consistency.
• Filename Casing Fix: The Python script import_industry_data_and_gen_mcf.py was updated to output the MCF file with consistent lowercase naming: states_gdp_industry_statvars.mcf.
• NAICS Code Formatting: Adjustments were made in states_gdp_industry_statvars.mcf to correct the formatting of NAICS codes for specific nodes, changing & to _ in both node IDs and naics property values.
• New Statistical Variable: A new statistical variable node for NAICS 92, including its statType, was added to states_gdp_industry_statvars.mcf.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request effectively addresses the missing statType property in the MCF files, which is a great fix. The changes also include correcting identifiers by replacing ampersands with underscores, which improves consistency, and adding a new node for NAICS code 92. The changes look solid. I have one suggestion regarding updating the documentation to ensure it stays in sync with these updates.

[gemini-code-assist]

The identifiers for some industry codes (e.g., durable and nondurable goods manufacturing) have been updated, replacing ampersands with underscores. This is a good correction. However, the project's README.md file still refers to the old identifiers with ampersands, and it's also missing the newly added NAICS code 92. To ensure the documentation is accurate and to prevent confusion, please consider updating the README.md to reflect these changes.