Skip to content

DSE 6.9.10 Release Notes #212

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

DSE 6.9.10 Release Notes #212

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

emerkle826
Copy link
Contributor


Release Notes Automation

If you name your pull-request as "Product x.y.z Release ...", after merging the
PR, a GitHub Action will automatically create a product version tag "product-x.y.z".

Supported product names are:

  • DSE
  • OpsCenter
  • Studio
  • Luna Streaming

Version supports 3 sets or 4 sets of digits.

Copy link
Member

@tiagomlalves tiagomlalves left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Non-blocking comments that can be later fixed if needed.

If you're developing applications, please refer to the [Java Driver documentation](https://docs.datastax.com/en/driver-matrix/doc/java-drivers.html) to choose an appropriate version.

## 6.9.10 DSE Core
* Updated the Java Development Kit (JDK) versions to `8u452` and `11.0.27`. These JDKs help build and test DSE, and are available in DSE Docker images. The following exceptions for DSE UBI images apply:. (DSP-24710)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@emerkle826 and @rh-datastax there's missing text here. Reasoning is that when we generate the release notes, we consider only a single paragraph and any newline and others get ignored. Can we rework the template to ensure automatic generation can still be done?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rh-datastax foudn the same issue in the 6.8.58 release notes. I'll manually update it this time, but maybe we need to adjust the Jira template so that there is a RN field for this tool only, and an additional field for more details that we want to track, but not generate in the Release Notes?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@emerkle826 & @tiagomlalves - Sounds like a good idea. Do you know who owns the templates?

@emerkle826 emerkle826 force-pushed the dse-6.9.10-release branch from e50b616 to a3c8ee0 Compare June 16, 2025 14:22
Copy link
Contributor

@rh-datastax rh-datastax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small fixes, otherwise LGTM.

* Removed non-supported Java 8 configuration files. (DSP-24845)

## 6.9.10 DSE CVE
* Upgraded the `net.minidev:json-smart` Java JSON parser package to version `2.5.2` to resolve a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability. (DSP-24851, [CVE-2024-57699](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57699))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Upgraded the `net.minidev:json-smart` Java JSON parser package to version `2.5.2` to resolve a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability. (DSP-24851, [CVE-2024-57699](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57699))
* Upgraded the `net.minidev:json-smart` Java JSON parser package to version `2.5.2`. (DSP-24851, [CVE-2024-57699](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57699))

* Upgraded the Apache Commons BeanUtils library to version `1.11.0` to resolve a vulnerability. (DSP-24857, [CVE-2025-48734](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-48734))
* Upgraded Netty to version `4.1.119.1.dse`, which is based on version `4.1.119.Final`. (DSP-24850, [CVE-2025-24970](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24970))
* Upgraded the protocol buffers (protobuf) to version `4.29.4` to support DSE core workloads. (DSP-24853, [CVE-2024-7254](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-7254))
* Added a fix for [HADOOP-19031|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19031] into the DSE Hadoop software codebase. (DSP-24859, [CVE-2024-23454](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-23454))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Added a fix for [HADOOP-19031|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19031] into the DSE Hadoop software codebase. (DSP-24859, [CVE-2024-23454](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-23454))
* Added a fix for [HADOOP-19031](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19031) into the DSE Hadoop software codebase. (DSP-24859, [CVE-2024-23454](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-23454))

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks again on this, I should have figured it would be the same as with 6.8.58

@emerkle826 emerkle826 force-pushed the dse-6.9.10-release branch from a3c8ee0 to 8bd890d Compare June 16, 2025 18:20
@rh-datastax rh-datastax merged commit 6ffe51c into master Jun 16, 2025
**NOTE**: above-listed DSE Java Driver is an _internal-version_ only.
If you're developing applications, please refer to the [Java Driver documentation](https://docs.datastax.com/en/driver-matrix/doc/java-drivers.html) to choose an appropriate version.

## 6.8.58 DSE Core
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@emerkle826 need to replace 6.8.38 reference here with 6.9.10

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants