Skip to content

Conversation

@davidb-demoduck
Copy link

Pull Request

πŸ“‹ Description

πŸ”— Related Issues

  • Fixes #
  • Relates to #

🎯 Type of Change

  • πŸ› Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • πŸ’₯ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • πŸ“š Documentation update
  • πŸ”§ Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • ⚑ Performance improvement
  • πŸ§ͺ Test additions or improvements
  • πŸš€ CI/CD improvements
  • πŸ—οΈ Infrastructure changes

πŸ§ͺ Testing

Test Results

  • βœ… All existing tests pass (dotnet test FabrikamTests/)
  • βœ… New tests added for new functionality
  • βœ… Manual testing completed
  • βœ… API endpoints tested (via api-tests.http)
  • βœ… MCP tools tested (via Test-Development.ps1 -McpOnly)
  • βœ… Integration tests pass (Test-Development.ps1 -Verbose)

Test Commands Run

# List the commands you used to test
.\Test-Development.ps1 -Quick
.\Test-Development.ps1 -ApiOnly
.\Test-Development.ps1 -McpOnly
dotnet test FabrikamTests/

πŸ“Έ Screenshots/Demos

πŸ”§ Technical Details

API Changes

  • New endpoints added
  • Existing endpoints modified
  • Database schema changes
  • DTO/model changes
  • Configuration changes

MCP Changes

  • New MCP tools added
  • Existing tools modified
  • Tool descriptions updated
  • Error handling improved

Infrastructure Changes

  • Azure resource changes
  • GitHub Actions workflow changes
  • Environment configuration changes
  • Port/networking changes

πŸ“š Documentation

  • Code is self-documenting with clear method/class names
  • XML documentation comments added/updated
  • README.md updated (if needed)
  • API documentation updated (if needed)
  • MCP tool descriptions are clear and helpful

βœ… Quality Checklist

  • Code follows the project's coding standards
  • Async/await patterns used consistently
  • Proper error handling implemented
  • Structured logging added where appropriate
  • No hardcoded values (using configuration)
  • Security considerations addressed
  • Performance impact considered
  • Backward compatibility maintained (or breaking changes documented)

πŸš€ Deployment Considerations

  • Changes are compatible with Azure App Service deployment
  • Environment variables/configuration documented
  • Database migration needed (if applicable)
  • No impact on existing production data
  • Rollback plan considered

πŸ‘₯ Review Notes

πŸ“‹ Post-Merge Tasks

  • Update production configuration
  • Monitor deployment logs
  • Update project documentation
  • Notify stakeholders

Reviewer Guidelines:

  • πŸ” Check that all tests pass
  • πŸ“– Verify code follows project standards
  • πŸ§ͺ Test the changes locally if possible
  • πŸ’­ Consider the impact on other developers
  • πŸš€ Ensure production readiness

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant