Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @dbookstaber, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on a significant update to the README.md documentation. The main objective is to improve the clarity and depth of information provided to users, particularly concerning fundamental ballistic concepts and the historical background of the project. The changes aim to make the documentation more informative and easier to navigate for anyone seeking to understand the library's principles and origins.
Highlights
- Enhanced Ballistic Concepts Documentation: The "Concepts" section within the
README.mdhas been extensively revised, moved to a more prominent position, and enriched with detailed explanations and illustrative diagrams covering ballistic coordinates, look angle (slant angle), and danger space. - Improved Project History and Context: The "About project" section has been updated to provide a more thorough historical overview of the underlying 3DoF ballistic model, detailing its origins and evolution through various programming language implementations.
- Documentation Refinements: Minor textual refinements, including grammatical corrections and wording improvements, have been applied across the
README.mdto enhance overall clarity and readability.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request appears to be for version 2.2.0rc1. The main changes involve significant improvements to the README.md file. The table of contents has been reorganized for better clarity, and a new 'Concepts' section has been added, providing detailed and helpful explanations of core ballistic concepts like coordinates, look angle, and danger space. The 'About project' section has also been updated with more historical context. These changes greatly enhance the documentation and make the project more accessible to new users. I've found one minor typo to correct.
|
|
||
| ## Look angle | ||
|
|
||
| *Look angle*, a.k.a. *slant angle*, is the elevation of the sight line (a.k.a., _Line of Sight_, or _LoS_) relative to the horizon. For angles close to horizontal (_flat fire_) this does not make a significant difference. When the look angle is significantly above or below the horizon the trajectory will be different because: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's a minor typo here with a double space between 'For' and 'angles'. It should be a single space for better readability.
| *Look angle*, a.k.a. *slant angle*, is the elevation of the sight line (a.k.a., _Line of Sight_, or _LoS_) relative to the horizon. For angles close to horizontal (_flat fire_) this does not make a significant difference. When the look angle is significantly above or below the horizon the trajectory will be different because: | |
| *Look angle*, a.k.a. *slant angle*, is the elevation of the sight line (a.k.a., _Line of Sight_, or _LoS_) relative to the horizon. For angles close to horizontal (_flat fire_) this does not make a significant difference. When the look angle is significantly above or below the horizon the trajectory will be different because: |
1 participant
No description provided.