Skip to content

Conversation

@aikido-autofix
Copy link

@aikido-autofix aikido-autofix bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Upgrading jinja2, sphinx to address vulnerabilities.

6 CVEs resolved by this upgrade

This PR will resolve the following CVEs:

Issue Severity           Description
CVE-2025-27516
HIGH
Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the
CVE-2024-56201
HIGH
Jinja is an extensible templating engine. In versions on the 3.x branch prior to 3.1.5, a bug in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker that controls both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, regardless of if Jinja's sandbox is used. To exploit the vulnerability, a...
CVE-2024-56326
HIGH
Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Prior to 3.1.5, An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the conten...
CVE-2024-22195
MEDIUM
Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja xmlattr filter can be abused ...
AIKIDO-2024-10560
MEDIUM
Affected versions of this package are affected by Code Injection due to a bypass in Jinja's sandbox validation that restricts direct calls to str.format possible by storing a reference to the format method of a malicious string and invoking it indirectly through a filter. This flaw allows an attac...
CVE-2024-34064
MEDIUM
Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The xmlattr filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, /, >, or =, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts ke...

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign opsiff for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @aikido-autofix[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a deepin-community member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Avenger-285714
Copy link
Member

/hold

@Avenger-285714
Copy link
Member

It doesn’t look very important, but we shouldn’t close this PR — it will pop up again later.

That said, we also shouldn’t merge the commit as-is because its commit message doesn’t comply with the kernel’s commit guidelines.

This issue appears to exist in upstream mainline as well; you can submit an upstream patch and backport it at an appropriate time.

@Avenger-285714
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

我来对这个git diff进行审查:

  1. 语法逻辑:
  • 语法上没有问题,这是一个requirements.txt文件的更新,格式符合Python依赖文件的规范。
  1. 代码质量:
  • 存在一个明显的逻辑冲突:
    • 第一行注释说明"jinja2>=3.1 is not compatible with Sphinx<4.0"
    • 但文件中同时指定了jinja2<3.1和jinja2==3.1.6
    • 这种冲突的依赖声明可能会导致包管理器行为不可预测
  1. 代码性能:
  • 对于requirements.txt文件,性能不是主要考虑因素,但依赖冲突可能导致安装失败或运行时问题。
  1. 代码安全:
  • 升级到Sphinx 2.4.5是一个好的实践,因为通常新版本会修复已知的安全漏洞。
  • 但是jinja2的版本冲突可能会引入安全风险,因为最终安装的版本可能不是预期的。

改进建议:

  1. 解决版本冲突:
# jinja2>=3.1 is not compatible with Sphinx<4.0
jinja2<3.1
Sphinx==2.4.5

或者如果确实需要jinja2 3.1.6,那么应该:

# jinja2>=3.1 requires Sphinx>=4.0
jinja2==3.1.6
Sphinx>=4.0
  1. 添加版本说明:
# jinja2>=3.1 is not compatible with Sphinx<4.0
# Using jinja2<3.1 to maintain compatibility with Sphinx 2.4.5
jinja2<3.1
Sphinx==2.4.5
  1. 考虑使用更精确的版本范围:
# jinja2>=3.1 is not compatible with Sphinx<4.0
jinja2>=3.0,<3.1
Sphinx==2.4.5

这些修改将使依赖关系更加清晰和可预测,避免潜在的安装和运行时问题。

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR attempts to address 6 security vulnerabilities (CVEs) in jinja2 and sphinx by upgrading these packages. The changes modify the Python package requirements file used for building Sphinx documentation. However, the PR contains a critical bug that will prevent the dependencies from being installed correctly.

Key Changes

  • Upgrades Sphinx from version 2.4.4 to 2.4.5
  • Attempts to add jinja2 version 3.1.6 to fix multiple high and medium severity CVEs
  • Introduces conflicting version constraints that will cause dependency resolution to fail

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants