chore(pre-commit): use mdformat to format Markdown

[njzjz-bot]

Follow up deepmodeling/deepmd-kit@69eb0c3, use mdformat to format Markdown.

• Add mdformat hook
• Remove markdown from prettier types_or

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@pre-commit-ci[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 29 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7950186 and 681ffe6.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .pre-commit-config.yaml
• docs/overall.md
• docs/tutorial/cl20.md
• docs/tutorial/methane.md

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[njzjz-bot]

pre-commit.ci autofix

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 11.55%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 7 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 8 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	WallTime	test_benchmark_detect[reacnetgen_param1]	3.2 ms	3.7 ms	-11.44%
❌	WallTime	test_benchmark_detect[reacnetgen_param2]	3.2 ms	3.6 ms	-11.55%

---

_{Comparing njzjz-bot:use-mdformat (681ffe6) with master (7950186)}

Footnotes

1. 8 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.26%. Comparing base (7950186) to head (681ffe6).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2420   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.26%   95.26%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        1457     1457           
=======================================
  Hits         1388     1388           
  Misses         69       69           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.