Implemented some improvements #40
Conversation
Bumps [@types/react-dom](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/tree/HEAD/types/react-dom) from 18.3.5 to 19.0.4. - [Release notes](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/releases) - [Commits](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/commits/HEAD/types/react-dom) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: "@types/react-dom" dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
…pment/types/react-dom-19.0.4 chore(deps-dev): bump @types/react-dom from 18.3.5 to 19.0.4
version downgrade to manually upgrade the tailwindcss to latest version
tailwindcss version updated to latest and changes made according to their needs
updated the release yml action (expected result) - run only on pull request when tag is implemented
WalkthroughThis pull request updates several configuration, dependency, and styling aspects across the project. The GitHub Actions release workflow now triggers on closed pull requests and verifies the latest tag before releasing. Husky hooks enforce stricter commit message formats and stage changes automatically. Additionally, dependencies and PostCSS setups have been adjusted for Tailwind CSS, while numerous UI components and CSS files have minor class name changes (e.g., replacing Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant PR as Pull Request Event
participant GH as GitHub Actions Runner
participant Git as Git CLI
PR->>GH: PR closed on master branch
GH->>GH: Check if PR is merged
GH->>Git: Run `git describe --tags --abbrev=0`
Git->>GH: Return LATEST_TAG value
alt Latest tag exists
GH->>GH: Create release using LATEST_TAG & generate release notes
else No tag found
GH->>GH: Skip release process
end
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 23
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/renderer/src/components/ui/tabs.tsx (1)
29-29: Maintain consistent focus styles across components.The change to
outline-hiddenshould be consistent with the application's focus management strategy. Consider using Tailwind's built-in focus utilities instead.Consider implementing a shared focus style utility to maintain consistency across all interactive components.
Also applies to: 45-45
src/renderer/src/components/ui/dialog.tsx (1)
8-8: Implement a centralized focus management strategy.The widespread changes to focus outline styles across components suggest a need for a more systematic approach.
Consider:
- Creating a shared focus style configuration in your Tailwind theme
- Implementing a custom focus management hook or utility
- Documenting accessibility requirements for focus styles
- Adding automated accessibility testing for focus management
Also applies to: 29-29, 45-45, 47-47
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)
29-37: Tag Verification Logic.
The step checks ifLATEST_TAGis empty and, if so, prints a message and exits. While this safeguards against proceeding without a tag, exiting with a non-zero code might cause the workflow to fail rather than gracefully skipping the release. Please verify that this behavior is acceptable for your release process.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (40)
.github/workflows/release.yml(3 hunks).husky/commit-msg(0 hunks).husky/pre-commit(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)postcss.config.js(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/assets/base.css(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/animata/interactive-grid.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/home/components/note-editor.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/home/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/minimal-tiptap-three.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/nav-secondary.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/shared/create-note-button.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/team-switcher.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/badge.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/button.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/checkbox.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/command.tsx(2 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/dialog.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/dotted-dialog.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/dropdown-menu.tsx(4 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/input.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/menubar.tsx(6 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/popover.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/radio-group.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/resizable.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/select.tsx(2 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/sheet.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/sidebar.tsx(13 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/switch.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/tabs.tsx(2 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/textarea.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/toast.tsx(4 hunks)src/renderer/src/components/ui/toggle.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/minimal-tiptap/components/bubble-menu/link-bubble-menu.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/minimal-tiptap/hooks/use-minimal-tiptap.ts(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/minimal-tiptap/minimal-tiptap.tsx(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/minimal-tiptap/styles/partials/code.css(1 hunks)src/renderer/src/routes/settings/_settings.appearance.tsx(2 hunks)src/renderer/src/windows/copy-widget/app/index.tsx(1 hunks)tailwind.config.js(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- tailwind.config.js
- .husky/commit-msg
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- src/renderer/src/minimal-tiptap/minimal-tiptap.tsx
- src/renderer/src/minimal-tiptap/components/bubble-menu/link-bubble-menu.tsx
- src/renderer/src/components/minimal-tiptap-three.tsx
- src/renderer/src/minimal-tiptap/hooks/use-minimal-tiptap.ts
- src/renderer/src/components/home/components/note-editor.tsx
- src/renderer/src/windows/copy-widget/app/index.tsx
- src/renderer/src/components/animata/interactive-grid.tsx
- src/renderer/src/components/nav-secondary.tsx
- src/renderer/src/components/ui/menubar.tsx
- src/renderer/src/routes/settings/_settings.appearance.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/renderer/src/assets/base.css
[error] 46-46: unexpected character ```
(parse)
[error] 46-46: unexpected character ```
(parse)
[error] 47-47: unexpected character ```
(parse)
[error] 47-47: unexpected character ```
(parse)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
src/renderer/src/components/ui/badge.tsx (1)
11-17: LGTM: Shadow classes are appropriately usedThe addition of
shadow-smto the default and destructive variants is valid and consistent with Tailwind CSS standards.src/renderer/src/components/ui/resizable.tsx (1)
1-45:Details
❌ Incorrect review comment
Verify Tailwind CSS version compatibility.
The PR objectives mention updating to Tailwind CSS v4, but Tailwind CSS v4 hasn't been released yet. The latest stable version is v3.x.
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest version of Tailwind CSS?💡 Result:
The latest version of Tailwind CSS as of February 20, 2025 is v4.0.7, released 2 days ago[6]. This follows the major v4.0 release on January 24, 2025[1][3], which introduced significant improvements including:
- 5x faster builds with a rewritten high-performance engine[1][3]
- CSS-first configuration replacing JavaScript setup[1][3][4]
- Automatic content detection without manual file configuration[1][3]
- First-party Vite plugin integration[1][3]
Recent minor updates (v4.0.4-v4.0.7) have focused on bug fixes and stability improvements, addressing issues like:
- Linux build compatibility[2]
- Vite plugin optimizations[2]
- CSS variable handling[2]
- Firefox-specific layout fixes[2]
You can install the latest version via npm:
npm install [email protected]The Tailwind team maintains an active release cycle with regular patches - check their GitHub releases[2] or npm page[6] for real-time updates.
Citations:
- 1: https://laravel-news.com/tailwind-css-v4-is-now-released
- 2: https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/releases
- 3: https://tailwindcss.com/blog/tailwindcss-v4
- 4: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/upgrade-guide
- 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHnG8tIYMB4
- 6: https://www.npmjs.com/package/tailwindcss
- 7: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/upcoming-changes
- 8: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gAASVgrYgo
Tailwind CSS v4 is now available—please disregard the earlier version compatibility concern.
The web query confirms that the latest stable version is v4.0.7 (released on January 24, 2025, with subsequent patch updates), so the PR’s objective to upgrade to Tailwind CSS v4 is valid. No changes are required in this file regarding Tailwind integration.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
src/renderer/src/components/ui/button.tsx (1)
8-8:Details
✅ Verification successful
Verify compatibility with Tailwind CSS v4.
The class
outline-hiddenmight not be a standard Tailwind CSS class. This could affect keyboard navigation accessibility.
🌐 Web query:
Does Tailwind CSS v4 support the 'outline-hidden' class? What are the recommended focus outline classes in Tailwind CSS?💡 Result:
Tailwind CSS v4 introduces significant changes to outline utilities, including support for
outline-hidden. Here's what developers need to know:Outline Changes in Tailwind v4
outline-hiddenreplaces v3'soutline-nonebehavior
The new utility setsoutline: 2px solid transparentandoutline-offset: 2pxto maintain accessibility in forced colors mode while visually hiding outlines[1][4][6]New
outline-nonebehavior
Now completely removes outlines withoutline-style: none, which isn't recommended for focus states due to accessibility concerns[4][6]<!-- Migration example --> <!-- Before (v3) --> <input class="focus:outline-none"> <!-- After (v4) --> <input class="focus:outline-hidden">Recommended Focus Outline Patterns
Accessible focus hiding
Usefocus:outline-hiddenwith complementary focus indicators:<button class="focus:outline-hidden focus:ring-2 focus:ring-blue-500"> Accessible button </button>Custom outline styles
Combine with other outline utilities:<input class="focus:outline-dashed focus:outline-2 focus:outline-blue-600">Forced colors compatibility
Use high-contrast outlines that work in Windows High Contrast Mode:<button class="focus:outline-black focus:outline-dotted"> High contrast button </button>Key Migration Considerations
- Update all
outline-noneusage tooutline-hiddenfor equivalent v3 behavior[1][4]- Test outline transitions as v4 now includes
transition-outline-colorby default[4]- Configure custom outlines through
theme.outlinein config file when needed[2][6]The changes emphasize better accessibility alignment while giving developers more control over focus states. Always pair outline modifications with visible focus indicators for WCAG compliance[6][7].
Citations:
- 1: https://blog.logrocket.com/getting-ready-tailwind-v4/
- 2: https://v1.tailwindcss.com/docs/outline
- 3: https://shuffle.dev/tailwind/classes/forms/focus-within
- 4: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/upgrade-guide
- 5: https://kombai.com/tailwind/outline-style/
- 6: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/outline-style
- 7: https://tailwind-search.barvian.me/docs/outline-style
- 8: https://tailwindcss.com/blog/tailwindcss-v4
- 9: https://v3.tailwindcss.com/docs/outline-style
- 10: tailwindlabs/tailwindcss#15152
Tailwind CSS v4 Compatibility Confirmed
After reviewing the code and verifying against the Tailwind CSS v4 documentation, it is confirmed that
outline-hiddenis a valid class in Tailwind CSS v4. The change fromfocus-visible:outline-nonetofocus-visible:outline-hiddenis appropriate and maintains accessibility (especially when paired with the visible focus indicators likefocus-visible:ring-2).
- Validation: Tailwind CSS v4 explicitly supports
outline-hiddento replace the olderoutline-noneutility.- Accessibility: The focus ring utilities in the snippet ensure that focus states remain visually indicated.
- Action: No further changes are required regarding these classes.
src/renderer/src/components/ui/select.tsx (2)
20-20:Details
✅ Verification successful
Verify Tailwind CSS class compatibility.
The changes from
shadow-smtoshadow-xsandoutline-nonetooutline-hiddenneed verification as they are not standard Tailwind CSS v3 classes.
🌐 Web query:
Does Tailwind CSS v4 introduce shadow-xs and outline-hidden classes?💡 Result:
Tailwind CSS v4.0 introduces both shadow-xs and outline-hidden classes as part of its updated utility system[1][3][5][8].
Key Changes
shadow-xs
- Replaces
shadow-smfrom Tailwind v3[1][8]- Defined as
box-shadow: var(--shadow-xs)with values0 1px 2px 0 rgb(0 0 0 / 0.05)[2][8]- Part of a renamed shadow scale:
| v3 Class | v4 Class | |----------|------------| | shadow-sm | shadow-xs | | shadow | shadow-sm |outline-hidden
- Replaces the behavior of
outline-nonefrom v3[3][8]- Maintains the transparent 2px outline removal that
outline-nonepreviously handled[3]- The new
outline-nonecompletely removes outlines without fallback styling[3]These changes align with Tailwind's effort to improve naming consistency and CSS standards compliance in v4[1][4][7]. Developers should update existing projects using automated migration tools like
npx @tailwindcss/upgrade@next[5][8].Citations:
- 1: https://dev.to/kasenda/whats-new-and-migration-guide-tailwind-css-v40-3kag
- 2: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/box-shadow
- 3: https://blog.logrocket.com/getting-ready-tailwind-v4/
- 4: https://laravel-news.com/tailwind-css-v4-is-now-released
- 5: https://tailgrids.com/blog/tailgrids-tailwindcss-v4
- 6: https://v3.tailwindcss.com/docs/v4-beta
- 7: https://tailwindcss.com/blog/tailwindcss-v4
- 8: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/upgrade-guide
- 9: https://www.codecademy.com/article/what-are-the-utility-classes-in-tailwind-css
- 10: https://flowbite.com/blog/tailwind-v4/
Tailwind v4 Compatibility Confirmed
The updates replacingshadow-smwithshadow-xsandoutline-nonewithoutline-hiddenhave been verified against Tailwind CSS v4 documentation. Both classes are now standard in v4—shadow-xsas part of the updated shadow scale andoutline-hiddenproviding the intended behavior change. No further modifications are required.
114-114:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Maintain consistency with Tailwind CSS classes.
The change from
outline-nonetooutline-hiddenshould be consistent with Tailwind CSS standards.Let's verify if this is a custom utility class defined in the project:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for outline-hidden utility class definition rg -l "outline-hidden" "*.css"Length of output: 76
Please run the above script to check if the "outline-hidden" utility is defined anywhere in the repository.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any occurrence of "outline-hidden" across the entire repository rg -n "outline-hidden" .Length of output: 13755
Ensure Consistent Outline Utility Usage
The code consistently uses
outline-hidden(e.g., in the select, input, button, and other UI components), which suggests it's an intentional custom utility. However, note thatoutline-hiddenisn’t part of Tailwind’s default utilities. Please verify that this utility is correctly defined in your Tailwind configuration or global styles and that its behavior truly aligns with our design intentions. If it was meant to replaceoutline-none, ensure that all components follow the same convention.src/renderer/src/components/ui/dropdown-menu.tsx (2)
30-30: Review data attribute selector syntax.The change from
[&_svg]to[&>svg]modifies the CSS selector specificity. The new syntax targets direct child SVG elements, which is more specific and potentially better for performance.
291-294:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify data attribute selector changes.
The changes in data attribute selectors:
- From
[[data-side=left]toin-data-[side=left]- From
group-data-[collapsible=offcanvas]to a different format
These changes appear to be using a new syntax. Please verify if this is part of Tailwind CSS v4 or a custom configuration.
🌐 Web query:
What is the correct syntax for data attribute selectors in Tailwind CSS v4?💡 Result:
In Tailwind CSS v4, data attribute selectors use simplified syntax with two primary approaches:
1. Boolean Data Attributes (Presence/Absence)
<div data-active class="data-active:border-purple-500">Applies styles when the attribute exists[1][7].
2. Specific Value Matching
<div data-size="large" class="data-[size=large]:p-8">Uses square brackets for value comparison[1][3][7].
Key improvements in v4:
- No configuration needed for basic data attributes[5][7]
- Works with boolean attributes without explicit values[7]
- Supports complex comparisons using arbitrary values[1]
Advanced Usage
Parent-to-child styling (using group):
<div data-state="open" class="group"> <div class="group-data-[state=open]:block">Combined with other variants:
<button class="disabled:opacity-50 data-[state=active]:bg-blue-500" disabled data-state="active" >For numeric comparisons:
<div data-percentage="75" class="w-[calc(var(--percentage)*1%)]">The syntax follows CSS attribute selector rules[6], with Tailwind handling the selector generation automatically[1][7].
Citations:
- 1: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/hover-focus-and-other-states
- 2: https://syntax.fm/show/877/tailwind-4
- 3: https://tailwindcss.com/blog/tailwindcss-v3-2
- 4: tailwindlabs/tailwindcss#9879
- 5: https://tigerabrodi.blog/tailwind-v4-features-im-excited-about
- 6: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Attribute_selectors
- 7: https://tailwindcss.com/blog/tailwindcss-v4
- 8: tailwindlabs/tailwindcss#1150
- 9: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRfF4G2Ra-c
- 10: tailwindlabs/tailwindcss#15116
Action Required: Confirm Tailwind Data Attribute Selector Syntax
Based on the Tailwind CSS v4 documentation, data attribute selectors for specific value matching should use the format
data-[attribute=value](e.g.,data-[side=left]) and, for group variants, the syntax should follow the examplegroup-data-[state=open]:block. The changes in the file appear to reflect this new convention. However, note the following:
- The new code uses the prefix
in-data-[side=left]instead of the expecteddata-[side=left]. Please confirm whether thein-prefix is an intentional custom variant or a typo.- Verify that the use of
group-data-[collapsible=offcanvas]aligns with your Tailwind configuration for group variants.Please double-check these points against your project's Tailwind configuration to ensure consistency with Tailwind CSS v4 standards.
src/renderer/src/minimal-tiptap/styles/partials/code.css (2)
4-4: Consistent border radius updates.The change from
roundedtorounded-smfor both inline code and pre elements maintains visual consistency. This aligns with the design system's move towards smaller border radii.Also applies to: 8-8
1-2:Details
✅ Verification successful
Verify the base CSS import path.
The import statement for base CSS has been added. Ensure this path is correct and the file exists.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the base CSS file exists test -f "src/renderer/src/assets/base.css" && echo "File exists" || echo "File not found"Length of output: 75
Base CSS Import Verified
- The base CSS file exists at
src/renderer/src/assets/base.css, so the import statement is correct.- The minor styling changes (border radius modifications and Tailwind @apply usage) appear to be minimal and acceptable.
.github/workflows/release.yml (4)
3-7: Transition to Pull Request Trigger.
The workflow is now set to trigger on pull requests (closed event) on the master branch instead of on pushes. This aligns with the PR objectives. Please double-check that this change fully meets your release process requirements.
15-15: Updated Job Condition.
The job now runs only when the pull request is merged, using the condition:if: ${{ github.repository_owner == 'your-ehsan' && github.event.pull_request.merged}}This ensures that releases are created only for merged PRs.
25-28: Added Tag Retrieval Step.
A new step retrieves the latest tag usinggit describe --tags --abbrev=0and sets it in the environment variableLATEST_TAG. Ensure that your repository always has at least one tag; otherwise, the subsequent tag verification may cause the job to fail.
90-92: Updated Release Step Parameters.
TheCreate Releasestep now passes the retrieved tag viatag_name: ${{ env.LATEST_TAG }}and enables release notes generation withgenerate_release_notes: true. This modification is inline with the updated tag retrieval logic.package.json (2)
97-97: New Tailwind PostCSS Plugin Dependency.
The addition of"@tailwindcss/postcss": "^4.0.7"in devDependencies ensures enhanced compatibility with Tailwind CSS v4. Make sure your PostCSS configuration (inpostcss.config.js) is updated accordingly to leverage this new plugin.
103-103: Upgraded React DOM Type Definitions.
The update of"@types/react-dom"from^18.3.5to^19.0.4should improve type safety and compatibility with your React version. Please verify that no breaking type issues arise from this upgrade.src/renderer/src/assets/base.css (2)
1-3: Tailwind CSS and Plugin Integration.
The file now starts with:@import 'tailwindcss'; @plugin 'tailwindcss-animate';Ensure that your build pipeline (e.g., PostCSS configuration) recognizes the
@plugindirective and that these directives are compatible with Tailwind CSS v4.
7-7: Custom Dark Variant Declaration.
The custom variant defined as:@custom-variant dark (&:is(.dark *));is an interesting approach to handle dark mode styling. Please test this thoroughly across your components to ensure it behaves as expected.
| @@ -1 +1,2 @@ | |||
| pnpm pre-commit | |||
| git add . | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove automatic staging of all files.
Adding git add . after pnpm pre-commit is risky as it:
- Automatically stages all changes, bypassing Git's selective staging process
- Could lead to accidental commits of sensitive data or debug code
- Makes it harder to create atomic commits with related changes
Remove this line to maintain control over what gets committed:
-git add .📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| git add . |
| plugins: { | ||
| tailwindcss: {}, | ||
| autoprefixer: {} | ||
| '@tailwindcss/postcss': {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the Tailwind CSS package and version.
The package @tailwindcss/postcss doesn't exist in the npm registry, and Tailwind CSS v4 hasn't been released yet. The current stable version is v3.4.1.
Restore the original configuration:
- '@tailwindcss/postcss': {}
+ 'tailwindcss': {},
+ 'autoprefixer': {}🌐 Web query:
What is the latest version of Tailwind CSS?
💡 Result:
The latest version of Tailwind CSS is v4.0.7, released on February 18, 2025[6]. This follows the major v4.0 release in January 2025, which introduced significant architectural changes including:
- 5x faster builds with a rewritten core engine[1][3]
- CSS-first configuration replacing JavaScript setup[1][3]
- Automatic template detection eliminating content configuration[2][3]
- Native CSS variables for theme customization[3][5]
- First-party Vite plugin integration[1][7]
Key improvements in subsequent patches (v4.0.1–v4.0.7) include:
- Fixed crashes with null theme values[2]
- Improved Linux compatibility[2]
- Enhanced Vite integration stability[2]
- Better CSS variable handling[2]
Developers can install it via npm with npm install tailwindcss@latest or use the new browser-based workflow with @tailwindcss/browser[2][3]. The upgrade tool (npx @tailwindcss/upgrade) simplifies migration from v3[5].
Citations:
- 1: https://laravel-news.com/tailwind-css-v4-is-now-released
- 2: https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss/releases
- 3: https://tailwindcss.com/blog/tailwindcss-v4
- 4: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/upgrading-to-v2
- 5: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/upgrade-guide
- 6: https://www.npmjs.com/package/tailwindcss
- 7: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHnG8tIYMB4
- 8: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gAASVgrYgo
Correct the Tailwind CSS PostCSS plugin configuration.
Tailwind CSS v4 is available (v4.0.7 released in February 2025), but the change to use @tailwindcss/postcss is still problematic because there is no npm package by that name. Please revert to the standard configuration that uses the official Tailwind CSS and Autoprefixer packages.
- Action: Update
postcss.config.jsat line 3. - Diff:
- '@tailwindcss/postcss': {} + 'tailwindcss': {}, + 'autoprefixer': {}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| '@tailwindcss/postcss': {} | |
| 'tailwindcss': {}, | |
| 'autoprefixer': {} |
| <textarea | ||
| className={cn( | ||
| 'flex min-h-[60px] w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-transparent px-3 py-2 text-base shadow-sm placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-ring disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm', | ||
| 'flex min-h-[60px] w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-transparent px-3 py-2 text-base shadow-xs placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-hidden focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-ring disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❓ Verification inconclusive
Fix invalid Tailwind CSS class names.
The class outline-hidden is not a valid Tailwind CSS class. The correct class for hiding outline is outline-none.
Fix the class names:
- 'flex min-h-[60px] w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-transparent px-3 py-2 text-base shadow-xs placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-hidden focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-ring disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm',
+ 'flex min-h-[60px] w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-transparent px-3 py-2 text-base shadow-sm placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-ring disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm',🌐 Web query:
What are the valid outline utility classes in Tailwind CSS?
💡 Result:
Tailwind CSS provides a comprehensive set of utility classes for controlling element outlines across four key styling dimensions:
Outline Styles
Control border pattern with these core classes:
outline-solid(default solid line)outline-dashed(dashed border)outline-dotted(dotted pattern)outline-double(double-line border)outline-none(completely removes outline)[10]outline-hidden(hides browser default while preserving forced-colors mode accessibility)[10]
Outline Widths
Adjust thickness using numeric values:
<button class="outline outline-1">1px</button>
<input class="outline outline-2">2px</input>
<div class="outline outline-4">4px</div>Valid widths: outline-0 to outline-8[1]
Outline Colors
Apply color using Tailwind's palette system:
<button class="outline outline-red-500">Red</button>
<div class="outline outline-blue-500">Blue</div>Works with all color variants like green-500, yellow-500, etc[1][7].
Outline Offsets
Create spacing between element and outline:
<button class="outline-offset-0">0px gap</button>
<div class="outline-offset-4">4px gap</div>Valid offsets: outline-offset-0 to outline-offset-8, plus arbitrary values with outline-offset-[2vw][3].
To use these effectively:
- Start with base
outlineclass - Layer style/width/color modifiers
- Add offset if needed[1][10]
<button class="outline outline-dashed outline-2 outline-blue-500 outline-offset-4">
Styled Button
</button>For accessibility, when using outline-none or outline-hidden, provide custom focus indicators through other visual cues like ring utilities or background color changes[10].
Citations:
- 1: https://www.makemysite.com/lessons/24/borders/outline
- 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oU5ar0dmQEY
- 3: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/outline-offset
- 4: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/styling-with-utility-classes
- 5: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/detecting-classes-in-source-files
- 6: https://dev.to/oyedeletemitope/six-tailwind-css-utility-classes-to-enhance-your-productivity-39ko
- 7: https://www.codecademy.com/article/what-are-the-utility-classes-in-tailwind-css
- 8: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/hover-focus-and-other-states
- 9: https://shuffle.dev/tailwind/classes
- 10: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/outline-style
Clarify and Verify Tailwind Class Intentions
After verifying the Tailwind CSS documentation, please note the following:
-
Outline Utility:
Bothoutline-noneandoutline-hiddenare valid Tailwind CSS classes.
• Useoutline-nonewhen you intend to completely remove the outline.
• Useoutline-hiddenif you want to hide the default browser outline while maintaining accessibility through forced-colors mode.
Confirm that your choice ofoutline-hiddenaligns with your design and accessibility goals. -
Shadow Utility:
The change fromshadow-smtoshadow-xsis non-standard with Tailwind's default configuration (which typically does not includeshadow-xs).
• Please verify ifshadow-xsis a custom class defined in your Tailwind configuration.
• If not custom, consider reverting toshadow-smto adhere to standard Tailwind utilities.
Review your Tailwind setup and the design intent for these classes, and adjust as needed.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| 'flex min-h-[60px] w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-transparent px-3 py-2 text-base shadow-xs placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-hidden focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-ring disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm', | |
| 'flex min-h-[60px] w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-transparent px-3 py-2 text-base shadow-sm placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-ring disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm', |
| <input | ||
| className={cn( | ||
| 'flex h-10 w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-sm ring-offset-background file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-foreground placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50', | ||
| 'flex h-10 w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-sm ring-offset-background file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-foreground placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-hidden focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix invalid Tailwind CSS class name.
The class outline-hidden is not a valid Tailwind CSS class. The correct class for hiding outline is outline-none.
Fix the class name:
- 'flex h-10 w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-sm ring-offset-background file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-foreground placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-hidden focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50',
+ 'flex h-10 w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-sm ring-offset-background file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-foreground placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| 'flex h-10 w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-sm ring-offset-background file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-foreground placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-hidden focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50', | |
| 'flex h-10 w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-sm ring-offset-background file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-foreground placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50', |
| ref={ref} | ||
| className={cn( | ||
| 'fixed top-0 z-[100] flex max-h-screen w-full flex-col-reverse p-4 sm:bottom-0 sm:right-0 sm:top-auto sm:flex-col md:max-w-[420px]', | ||
| 'fixed top-0 z-100 flex max-h-screen w-full flex-col-reverse p-4 sm:bottom-0 sm:right-0 sm:top-auto sm:flex-col md:max-w-[420px]', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Invalid z-index class syntax.
The class z-100 is not a valid arbitrary value syntax in Tailwind CSS.
Use the correct arbitrary value syntax:
- 'fixed top-0 z-100 flex max-h-screen w-full flex-col-reverse p-4 sm:bottom-0 sm:right-0 sm:top-auto sm:flex-col md:max-w-[420px]',
+ 'fixed top-0 z-[100] flex max-h-screen w-full flex-col-reverse p-4 sm:bottom-0 sm:right-0 sm:top-auto sm:flex-col md:max-w-[420px]',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| 'fixed top-0 z-100 flex max-h-screen w-full flex-col-reverse p-4 sm:bottom-0 sm:right-0 sm:top-auto sm:flex-col md:max-w-[420px]', | |
| 'fixed top-0 z-[100] flex max-h-screen w-full flex-col-reverse p-4 sm:bottom-0 sm:right-0 sm:top-auto sm:flex-col md:max-w-[420px]', |
| <CommandPrimitive.Input | ||
| className={cn( | ||
| 'flex h-10 w-full rounded-md bg-transparent py-3 text-sm outline-none placeholder:text-muted-foreground disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50', | ||
| 'flex h-10 w-full rounded-md bg-transparent py-3 text-sm outline-hidden placeholder:text-muted-foreground disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Invalid Tailwind class affecting accessibility.
The class outline-hidden is not a valid Tailwind CSS class. This change could break focus visibility and harm accessibility in both CommandInput and CommandItem components.
Use the standard Tailwind class:
- 'flex h-10 w-full rounded-md bg-transparent py-3 text-sm outline-hidden placeholder:text-muted-foreground disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50',
+ 'flex h-10 w-full rounded-md bg-transparent py-3 text-sm outline-none placeholder:text-muted-foreground disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50',
- 'relative flex cursor-default gap-2 select-none items-center rounded-sm px-2 py-1.5 text-sm outline-hidden data-[disabled=true]:pointer-events-none data-[selected=true]:bg-accent data-[selected=true]:text-accent-foreground data-[disabled=true]:opacity-50 [&_svg]:pointer-events-none [&_svg]:size-4 [&_svg]:shrink-0',
+ 'relative flex cursor-default gap-2 select-none items-center rounded-sm px-2 py-1.5 text-sm outline-none data-[disabled=true]:pointer-events-none data-[selected=true]:bg-accent data-[selected=true]:text-accent-foreground data-[disabled=true]:opacity-50 [&_svg]:pointer-events-none [&_svg]:size-4 [&_svg]:shrink-0',Also applies to: 120-120
| <div | ||
| className={cn( | ||
| 'flex h-full w-[--sidebar-width] flex-col bg-sidebar text-sidebar-foreground', | ||
| 'flex h-full w-(--sidebar-width) flex-col bg-sidebar text-sidebar-foreground', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Review CSS variable syntax changes.
The changes from w-[--sidebar-width] to w-(--sidebar-width) appear across multiple elements. This syntax change needs verification as it's not standard CSS variable usage.
Also applies to: 189-189, 217-217, 228-228
🌐 Web query:
What is the correct syntax for CSS custom properties (variables) in class names for Tailwind CSS v4?
💡 Result:
In Tailwind CSS v4, CSS custom properties (variables) can be directly integrated into utility classes using square bracket syntax for inline variable definitions or through theme-driven variables. Here's how it works:
1. Inline Custom Property Syntax
Use square brackets to define CSS variables directly within utility classes:
<div class="[--gutter-width:1rem] lg:[--gutter-width:2rem]">
<!-- Content -->
</div>This sets --gutter-width to 1rem by default and 2rem at larger breakpoints (lg:)[8].
2. Theme-Driven Custom Properties
Tailwind v4 automatically exposes design tokens as CSS variables under :root, enabling dynamic overrides:
/* Generated by Tailwind */
:root {
--color-red-500: oklch(0.84 0.18 117.33);
}Use these variables in utilities:
<div class="bg-[var(--color-red-500)]"></div>3. Arbitrary Value Syntax
For one-off values or dynamic adjustments:
<div class="max-h-[calc(100dvh-var(--spacing-6))]"></div>This combines theme variables (--spacing-6) with arbitrary calculations[8].
Key Features:
- Dynamic variants: Apply variables conditionally (e.g.,
hover:[--opacity:0.8]). - Arbitrary properties: Set non-theme CSS variables (e.g.,
[--custom-gradient:#316ff6_20%])[8]. - Responsive design: Modify variables across breakpoints (e.g.,
md:[--scale:1.2])[4][8].
Best Practices:
- Avoid dynamically constructing class names with string interpolation (e.g.,
bg-${color}-500)[2]. - Prefer static mappings for theme-driven props:
const colorVariants = {
red: "bg-[var(--color-red-500)]",
blue: "bg-[var(--color-blue-500)]",
};For runtime flexibility, combine Tailwind’s theme variables with inline custom properties[4][8].
Citations:
- 1: https://dev.to/wearethreebears/exploring-typesafe-design-tokens-in-tailwind-4-372d
- 2: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/detecting-classes-in-source-files
- 3: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/theme
- 4: https://tailwindcss.com/blog/tailwindcss-v4
- 5: https://github.com/francoismassart/eslint-plugin-tailwindcss/blob/master/docs/rules/no-custom-classname.md
- 6: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/--*
- 7: [Feature Proposal] Provide Configuration as CSS Custom Properties tailwindlabs/tailwindcss#1091
- 8: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/styling-with-utility-classes
- 9: https://blog.logrocket.com/how-to-use-css-variables-like-a-pro/
- 10: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/adding-custom-styles
Action Required: Correct CSS Variable Syntax Usage
Tailwind CSS v4 requires using square bracket syntax with the var() function for inline custom property references. The current usage of w-(--sidebar-width) is incorrect. Instead, please update this to use the proper format: w-[var(--sidebar-width)].
Please ensure the following changes in src/renderer/src/components/ui/sidebar.tsx:
- Line 174: Replace
w-(--sidebar-width)withw-[var(--sidebar-width)] - Line 189: Replace
w-(--sidebar-width)withw-[var(--sidebar-width)] - Line 217: Replace
w-(--sidebar-width)withw-[var(--sidebar-width)] - Line 228: Replace
w-(--sidebar-width)withw-[var(--sidebar-width)]
| ? 'group-data-[collapsible=icon]:w-[calc(var(--sidebar-width-icon)+(--spacing(4)))]' | ||
| : 'group-data-[collapsible=icon]:w-(--sidebar-width-icon)' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify spacing calculation syntax.
The changes in spacing calculations:
- From
calc(var(--sidebar-width-icon)+(--spacing(4)))to a new format - Using parentheses instead of square brackets
These changes need verification for correctness.
Also applies to: 234-235
🌐 Web query:
What is the correct syntax for calc() expressions with CSS variables in Tailwind CSS v4?
💡 Result:
In Tailwind CSS v4.0, using calc() with CSS variables follows these syntax rules:
Standard Syntax
<!-- Use var() notation within calc -->
<div class="w-[calc(var(--column-width)*3)]">Simplified Formatting
- Replace spaces with underscores
_(optional but improves readability) - Omit semicolons
<div class="w-[calc(var(--spacing)_*_3)]">Key Features in v4:
-
Native CSS Variable Support
All theme values are exposed as CSS variables by default[8][9]:<div class="w-[calc(theme(spacing.12)_+_var(--custom))]">
-
Dynamic Utilities
Directly reference theme variables without configuration::root { --spacing: 0.25rem; /* From theme */ }
<div class="mt-[calc(var(--spacing)*8)]">
-
Arbitrary Value Flexibility
Combine with other CSS functions:<div class="h-[calc(100vh_-_clamp(2rem,5vw,4rem))]">
Example Use Cases
| Scenario | Code Example |
|---|---|
| Grid layout | grid-cols-[repeat(auto-fit,minmax(calc(var(--min-col)_-_1rem),1fr))] |
| Spacing math | px-[calc(var(--gutter)/2)] |
| Viewport adjustments | top-[calc(50%_+_theme(spacing.4))] |
For recurring patterns, define custom properties in your base CSS:
:root {
--header-height: 80px;
}<main class="min-h-[calc(100vh_-_var(--header-height))]">[1][8][9][10]
Citations:
- 1: https://cruip.com/how-to-use-calc-in-tailwind-css/
- 2: https://blogs.purecode.ai/blogs/tailwind-calc
- 3: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/calc
- 4: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/how-to-use-calc-in-tailwind-css
- 5: https://blog.logrocket.com/how-when-use-css-calc-tutorial-examples/
- 6: Simplified syntax of CSS variables and `calc` in arbitrary values tailwindlabs/tailwindcss#12282
- 7: v4: define all Tailwind CSS Variables using ":root, :host" selector for Shadow DOM compatibility tailwindlabs/tailwindcss#15556
- 8: https://tailwindcss.com/blog/tailwindcss-v4
- 9: https://tailwindcss.com/blog/tailwindcss-v4-alpha
- 10: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/functions-and-directives
Spacing calculation syntax requires adjustment.
- The calc() expression in the first branch is correctly wrapped in square brackets, but the inner syntax should reference CSS variables using proper var() notation. For example, instead of using
(--spacing(4))it should likely bevar(--spacing-4)(or use Tailwind’s theme function, e.g.theme(spacing.4), if that was the intent). - The alternate (false) branch currently uses parentheses as in
w-(--sidebar-width-icon), which does not conform to Tailwind v4’s arbitrary value syntax. It should be updated to use square brackets – for instance:w-[var(--sidebar-width-icon)]. - These changes are also applicable to lines 234–235.
| --radius-lg: `var(--radius) `; | ||
| --radius-md: `calc(var(--radius) - 2px) `; | ||
| --radius-sm: calc(var(--radius) - 4px); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Removal of Unintended Backticks in CSS Custom Properties.
The following lines use backticks around the CSS values, which may cause syntax errors:
--radius-lg: `var(--radius) `;
--radius-md: `calc(var(--radius) - 2px) `;
It is recommended to remove the backticks so that the properties are defined as:
- --radius-lg: `var(--radius) `;
- --radius-md: `calc(var(--radius) - 2px) `;
+ --radius-lg: var(--radius);
+ --radius-md: calc(var(--radius) - 2px);This change will ensure that the custom properties are parsed correctly by browsers.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| --radius-lg: `var(--radius) `; | |
| --radius-md: `calc(var(--radius) - 2px) `; | |
| --radius-sm: calc(var(--radius) - 4px); | |
| --radius-lg: var(--radius); | |
| --radius-md: calc(var(--radius) - 2px); | |
| --radius-sm: calc(var(--radius) - 4px); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 46-46: unexpected character ```
(parse)
[error] 46-46: unexpected character ```
(parse)
[error] 47-47: unexpected character ```
(parse)
[error] 47-47: unexpected character ```
(parse)
it is the latest version of tailwindcss@v4 Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit